We won't bother when we win the next two by similar scores.Are we really counting friendlies now?
It totally questions all integrity. There were substitutions which automatically add 30 seconds….. to just blow your whistle because you think the game is done is completely wrong. I know it makes zero difference but it actually calls into question the impartiality of a refereeRef blowing up on 90' is just crazy. Against all the laws ever written about additional time.
Not any more. It's all time taken this season. But still....There were substitutions which automatically add 30 seconds…
Derisks injuries & cardsIt totally questions all integrity. There were substitutions which automatically add 30 seconds….. to just blow your whistle because you think the game is done is completely wrong. I know it makes zero difference but it actually calls into question the impartiality of a referee
No idea, but it’s even better at 20 goals in four games, if Rennes is included.When was the last time we scored 16 goals in three games?
Answers on a postcard...
Rennes held European Champions PSG to a draw last week. So I consider it reasonable to include the 4 goals we scored.No idea, but it’s even better at 20 goals in four games, if Rennes is included.
9 of the Rennes 11 that played against PSG started against us.Rennes held European Champions PSG to a draw last week. So I consider it reasonable to include the 4 goals we scored.
You haven't started the thread yet. It's self service hereOi where’s the champagne moments?
Someone has just said on the BBC site that the new arrangement is that the Ref will blow the whistle on 90 if the result is not in doubt.It totally questions all integrity. There were substitutions which automatically add 30 seconds….. to just blow your whistle because you think the game is done is completely wrong. I know it makes zero difference but it actually calls into question the impartiality of a referee
Did they specify the criteria for "not in doubt"??Someone has just said on the BBC site that the new arrangement is that the Ref will blow the whistle on 90 if the result is not in doubt.
If correct - and I'd never heard it - I assume that this can only be in Cup matches, otherwise GD could be decisive in a League race.
Don't ask me. I don't make the rules.Why can't he stop it at 80 minutes then? or HT?
It was someone in the Comments called "JezLowe", which got 4 x Thumbs Up, then "gillcal" replied: "Not true".Did they specify the criteria for "not in doubt"??
D'ya reckon Brum might have got 5 goals in the "extra" 15 mins?If a player was down for 15 minutes, are we saying the referee can still stop the game on 90? Does that come with a refund?
Can you point me at the law where it says the ref doesn't need to play any additional time because one team will obviously win regardless?Don't ask me. I don't make the rules.
No law, just common sense which VAR has taken away from referees!Can you point me at the law where it says the ref doesn't need to play any additional time because one team will obviously win regardless?
Ah so "common sense". Where is that in the laws of the game please?No law, just common sense which VAR has taken away from referees!
Not there, bit like you, not all there!Ah so "common sense". Where is that in the laws of the game please?
I wanted 7Did they specify the criteria for "not in doubt"??
I recall watching ref watch on sky last season and the same thing happened I think for an FA Cup game. Dermot Gallagher said something along the lines of for cup games where the scoreline is so one-sided that refs have the caveat to end the game and not play any stoppage time if they wish. He explained this isn't allowed in league games as goal difference is important and can impact on promotion and relegation etc.Ref blowing up on 90' is just crazy. Against all the laws ever written about additional time.
That makes sense actually.I recall watching ref watch on sky last season and the same thing happened I think for an FA Cup game. Dermot Gallagher said something along the lines of for cup games where the scoreline is so one-sided that refs have the caveat to end the game and not play any stoppage time if they wish. He explained this isn't allowed in league games as goal difference is important and can impact on promotion and relegation etc.
Makes a refreshing change. You see this a fair bit in European football. Quite convenient for getting away for public transport etcRef blowing up on 90' is just crazy. Against all the laws ever written about additional time.
That might change when they build their new stadium, but after last night it could be a waste of money.Brum lights have been awful for years
I remember in the early 70's we beat Peterborough 5-1 and Northampton 6-4 but dont know the games either side or in the middle.When was the last time we scored 16 goals in three games?
Answers on a postcard...
That makes sense actually.
But perhaps he needs to be informed of record away wins by a club against scum!
Very enjoyable evening's viewing, which continues in the comments here
View: https://x.com/BCFC/status/2092353512604639543?s=20
Friendlies against we scored 4 and won away whereas PSG. (yes PSG) couldn't beat the same time a week later. Is that ok?
I think he's basically making it up as he goes along and giving themselves power they should not have to interfere with a result (because the rules are badly written and just say "Allowance is made by the referee in each half for all playing time lost in that half").I recall watching ref watch on sky last season and the same thing happened I think for an FA Cup game. Dermot Gallagher said something along the lines of for cup games where the scoreline is so one-sided that refs have the caveat to end the game and not play any stoppage time if they wish. He explained this isn't allowed in league games as goal difference is important and can impact on promotion and relegation etc.
How does this sit with the betting industry I wonder, I might have been very very angry had I had £100 on a Collins hat trick last night!I only found this out recently but apparently a ref can end a game without playing the injury time if it's clearly over as a contest. When it happened before I think Michael Oliver was the ref.
I remember in the early 70's we beat Peterborough 5-1 and Northampton 6-4 but dont know the games either side or in the middle.
It was a shame he didn’t let us at least take the corner at the end. Sky even mentioned the Exeter game in 1983 where we got seven.It does make sense but I reckon the ref should ask both captains first. I reckon Collins would have said to play the additional time last night if asked!
The John O’Mara season?I remember in the early 70's we beat Peterborough 5-1 and Northampton 6-4 but dont know the games either side or in the middle.
4-0 & 6-0 in the two home games before that as well.Wasn’t the Northampton game 6-1? If so, these were my first two Bees games as a six year old. I remember thinking, is it like this every week? I was soon brought down to earth![]()
Maybe or 6-0 even. I was thinking of an evening game where we were 5-1 up and they pulled it back to 5-4 before we got the final goal. After their 3 very quick goals we took our kick off and Jackie Graham, I think, just booted the ball as far away from our goal possible!Wasn’t the Northampton game 6-1? If so, these were my first two Bees games as a six year old. I remember thinking, is it like this every week? I was soon brought down to earth![]()