A deserved win in the end for sure. And also an interesting, entertaining game, the first we’ve been involved in for a little while. To give the devil his due, Warburton’s QPR certainly played their part in that.
The first half wasn’t convincing from a tactical point of view. The midfield battle was being lost. Plus, Dalsgaard wasn’t right. They were the better side because of this. But Henrik aside, the players themselves were sharp and confident - even Bryan was taking on his man with some success. QPR were giving our key men space to play, we just needed to find the right tactics to get the best from them.
The second half system change was brave. Three at the back was nothing more than a failed experiment before tonight. But it worked perfectly. It gave Henry the ability to get forward without risking Samuel’s devastating breaks, and Sorensen looked after him brilliantly (to the point he ended up switching wings). It also allowed us to replace Henrik with another midfielder and wrestle back control of the ball. Kudos to Frank.
The win ought to have been more convincing, but we got the job done. Late in the game and after bringing on Canos we started to give away cheap free-kicks which could have cost us, but the back three was solid for the entire last 45, so comfortable in the the end.
To comment on QPR, unsurprisingly they remind me of Brentford 2-3 years back. Very pleasing on the eye, lots to like, but you can see how they will just leak goals. Their midfielders were scared of Janelt, their wing backs were a defensive liability, and our set piece goal reflects badly on their organisation.
The first half wasn’t convincing from a tactical point of view. The midfield battle was being lost. Plus, Dalsgaard wasn’t right. They were the better side because of this. But Henrik aside, the players themselves were sharp and confident - even Bryan was taking on his man with some success. QPR were giving our key men space to play, we just needed to find the right tactics to get the best from them.
The second half system change was brave. Three at the back was nothing more than a failed experiment before tonight. But it worked perfectly. It gave Henry the ability to get forward without risking Samuel’s devastating breaks, and Sorensen looked after him brilliantly (to the point he ended up switching wings). It also allowed us to replace Henrik with another midfielder and wrestle back control of the ball. Kudos to Frank.
The win ought to have been more convincing, but we got the job done. Late in the game and after bringing on Canos we started to give away cheap free-kicks which could have cost us, but the back three was solid for the entire last 45, so comfortable in the the end.
To comment on QPR, unsurprisingly they remind me of Brentford 2-3 years back. Very pleasing on the eye, lots to like, but you can see how they will just leak goals. Their midfielders were scared of Janelt, their wing backs were a defensive liability, and our set piece goal reflects badly on their organisation.