Gareth Southgate: Messiah or Very Lucky Boy? (1 Viewer)

BFC1997

Active member
Joined
12 Feb 2011
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
25
Location
Osterley
With all due respect I don't get what you're on about?

Southgate wasn't a player of the same stature of any of those players you've listed, you really need to list Southgate in a pair with someone like Gareth Barry ?
No he wasn't on the same level technically, but he's as much a leader as the rest. And my point is that it's been his life mission to succeed with England, that's what he cares about most, he's a proper England man.

Neville, Gerrard etc are all club over country, which I'm not knocking, but I think that makes GS more suited to the role than any of those.
 

The Pipe

Active member
Joined
7 Feb 2005
Messages
9,559
Reaction score
47
Location
churchinford Devon
Will hold my hands up as was not impressed with his appointment. However the more I hear about him, how clear his ideas for the future are, how he brings in experts from other disciplines and how he believes that he is always learning my opinion has been completely changed

There are some aspects of his selections and tactics that are open for discussion but he never hides from explaining his decisions and accepting when a mistake has been made.

Perhaps as he wasn’t a superstar filled with his own importance as many others have been ( often now summarisers for various TV companies) he appreciates far more the opportunity that has been given to him.

Irrespective of tomorrow’s results roll on the Euros as our young team ( joint youngest at the WC I believe) will have gained considerable experience and should be a TEAM to be feared as opposed to teams with star players.
 
OP
Lionel Bart-At

Lionel Bart-At

formerly known as 'heavywoollenbee'
Joined
14 Apr 2013
Messages
17,348
Reaction score
103
Location
Cranford
Waistcoat Wednesday tomorrow! I'm donning mine for school.
 

IDontBeeLieveIt

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2013
Messages
14,722
Reaction score
0
Will hold my hands up as was not impressed with his appointment. However the more I hear about him, how clear his ideas for the future are, how he brings in experts from other disciplines and how he believes that he is always learning my opinion has been completely changed

There are some aspects of his selections and tactics that are open for discussion but he never hides from explaining his decisions and accepting when a mistake has been made.

Perhaps as he wasn’t a superstar filled with his own importance as many others have been ( often now summarisers for various TV companies) he appreciates far more the opportunity that has been given to him.

Irrespective of tomorrow’s results roll on the Euros as our young team ( joint youngest at the WC I believe) will have gained considerable experience and should be a TEAM to be feared as opposed to teams with star players.
Think this probably goes for most of us.

The only criticisms I've had so far are.
I'd have had Loftus instead of Alli by now.
I'd never bring on Dier as well as Henderson.
I'd not try to play defensive when we've got a narrow lead as we tend to hand the impetus back to the opposition and it's never our forté sitting back (many teams are guilty of this and pay the price).

We usually look better as tournaments go on, so if we keep our heads, play with confidence, and avoid silly yellow/red cards (that have been the bain of England tournaments) we have a cracking chance. It's only (potentially) two matches!
 

Mudbone

Active member
Joined
6 Jan 2015
Messages
2,600
Reaction score
0
Think this probably goes for most of us.

The only criticisms I've had so far are.
I'd have had Loftus instead of Alli by now.
I'd never bring on Dier as well as Henderson.
I'd not try to play defensive when we've got a narrow lead as we tend to hand the impetus back to the opposition and it's never our forté sitting back (many teams are guilty of this and pay the price).

We usually look better as tournaments go on, so if we keep our heads, play with confidence, and avoid silly yellow/red cards (that have been the bain of England tournaments) we have a cracking chance. It's only (potentially) two matches!
You may need to sit down for this mate, but SSN has suggested Southgate MIGHT

consider playing Dier & Henderson together - but unlikely.

They also mentioned Henderson has a slight injury but is likely to play.
 

james2b

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2011
Messages
537
Reaction score
0
Good manager but timing of subs could win semis or even a World Cup 😒
 

Cham

Active member
Joined
12 Nov 2012
Messages
3,359
Reaction score
16
Location
Isleworth
Did very well.. given the hype and egos that are usually associated with the England team... Vardy had a groin injury so couldn't come on earlier... apart from Rahford did we have any better goal threats?? Also gave us a massive strength by improving our set pieces..
 

Newport Pagnell Bee

Active member
Joined
3 May 2004
Messages
9,636
Reaction score
0
Location
Lyme Regis, Dorset
Did very well.. given the hype and egos that are usually associated with the England team... Vardy had a groin injury so couldn't come on earlier... apart from Rahford did we have any better goal threats?? Also gave us a massive strength by improving our set pieces..
I'll probably get slaughtered but how weak did Vardy and Rashford look? We had a good 1st eleven but very little strength in depth imho.
 

malagakid

Active member
Joined
10 Feb 2015
Messages
3,416
Reaction score
0
It’s worth pointing out that 9 of our 12 goals were from set pieces. So credit due to allan russell our set piece coach who played a big role. He is a scot
 

Rubenhutchinson

Active member
Joined
8 Jul 2016
Messages
4,036
Reaction score
0
It’s worth pointing out that 9 of our 12 goals were from set pieces. So credit due to allan russell our set piece coach who played a big role. He is a scot
Credit to Gareth as well for going "let's work on set pieces as they could be important"
 

BFC1997

Active member
Joined
12 Feb 2011
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
25
Location
Osterley
It’s worth pointing out that 9 of our 12 goals were from set pieces. So credit due to allan russell our set piece coach who played a big role. He is a scot
Southgate himself has done a lot of studying of sports like Basketball and NFL as it’s all about finding tight spaces and sending/receiving the ball quickly. His strategy has been excellent, as well as the execution for AR and the players.
 

IDontBeeLieveIt

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2013
Messages
14,722
Reaction score
0
Alli and Lingard in key positions.

Alli did almost nothing in any game bar a bit of defensive work and one header.
Lingard had one good game but was mediocre in the rest.

Kane did well in most games but had a poor one against Croatia.

We were decent at set pieces but relying on that is too risky. We never addressed our lack of creativity that was obvious throughout the tournament. Sterling was the only real runner stretching them, and deserves credit, even if he fluffed things at the end.

It's interesting people mention the yank sports and Southgate learning from them......because large parts of many games it looked like the NFL. With every man (bar Sterling or sometimes Trippier) that didn't have the ball motionless. Moving it around between them but causing no danger.

People talked about the unity and mental strength......yet in numerous games our heads went down and we started clinging on for large periods.

A lot of things were better in this tournament and we were better to watch.....but we had the easiest route we'll ever have and there's not a great deal to suggest we'd have gone very far if we had a tough group (or route after that). Plenty of positives for the future (especially Maguire/Trippier/Pickford) and I think people like Henderson/Kane did well (despite a poorer final game from Kane). So going back to the start of my post. Alli and Lingard was where we lost it really and they were too anonymous for too much of the time. Loftus Cheek deserves a run instead of Alli from now on (he did from the second game onwards really).
 

beebopalula

Well-known member
Joined
14 Jul 2006
Messages
11,253
Reaction score
7
Location
Surbiton
Alli and Lingard in key positions.

Alli did almost nothing in any game bar a bit of defensive work and one header.
Lingard had one good game but was mediocre in the rest.

Kane did well in most games but had a poor one against Croatia.

We were decent at set pieces but relying on that is too risky. We never addressed our lack of creativity that was obvious throughout the tournament. Sterling was the only real runner stretching them, and deserves credit, even if he fluffed things at the end.

It's interesting people mention the yank sports and Southgate learning from them......because large parts of many games it looked like the NFL. With every man (bar Sterling or sometimes Trippier) that didn't have the ball motionless. Moving it around between them but causing no danger.

People talked about the unity and mental strength......yet in numerous games our heads went down and we started clinging on for large periods.

A lot of things were better in this tournament and we were better to watch.....but we had the easiest route we'll ever have and there's not a great deal to suggest we'd have gone very far if we had a tough group (or route after that). Plenty of positives for the future (especially Maguire/Trippier/Pickford) and I think people like Henderson/Kane did well (despite a poorer final game from Kane). So going back to the start of my post. Alli and Lingard was where we lost it really and they were too anonymous for too much of the time. Loftus Cheek deserves a run instead of Alli from now on (he did from the second game onwards really).
I'd agree with your focus on where we need to improve. Alli hasn't had a great tournament but l suspect he hasn't been fully fit. Lingard disappears for periods. Loftus Cheek looks to have significant potential but I'm not sure where the step up in quality is coming from. Nevertheless we have a platform to build on.
I was surprised that we didn't alter tactics yesterday to stop the incessant attacking along our flanks. It was obvious by half time that something needed to be done but it wasn't. It looked to me that Southgate had wanted to hit them on the break which was a perfectly good tactic and that could have worked against France but we needed to match them up in wide positions and we didn't. If you are going to adopt a counter attack position you must have a solid base.
However the great thing for me is that l now support our national team again. Everyone of them gave it all for the shirt.
 

TW1Bee

Active member
Joined
28 Mar 2005
Messages
5,626
Reaction score
20
Location
Strawberry Hill, Twickenham
One of Kane's real strengths IMO is winning penalties as shown in this W Cup. He's very good at leaning in to defenders and their natural reaction is to hold on to him and he does that very well . Did anyone else think he did a bit of rolling around last night when tackled a la South American style which lots on here were berating earlier in the tournament ?.
 

Beezy

Active member
Joined
19 Apr 2006
Messages
1,848
Reaction score
0
Hoping that young Foden of Man City continues to develop as his passing a la Gazza is a missing ingredient imo.
 

Stanley

Well-known member
Joined
10 Jan 2001
Messages
13,530
Reaction score
22
Alli and Lingard in key positions.

Alli did almost nothing in any game bar a bit of defensive work and one header.
Lingard had one good game but was mediocre in the rest.

Kane did well in most games but had a poor one against Croatia.

We were decent at set pieces but relying on that is too risky. We never addressed our lack of creativity that was obvious throughout the tournament. Sterling was the only real runner stretching them, and deserves credit, even if he fluffed things at the end.

It's interesting people mention the yank sports and Southgate learning from them......because large parts of many games it looked like the NFL. With every man (bar Sterling or sometimes Trippier) that didn't have the ball motionless. Moving it around between them but causing no danger.

People talked about the unity and mental strength......yet in numerous games our heads went down and we started clinging on for large periods.

A lot of things were better in this tournament and we were better to watch.....but we had the easiest route we'll ever have and there's not a great deal to suggest we'd have gone very far if we had a tough group (or route after that). Plenty of positives for the future (especially Maguire/Trippier/Pickford) and I think people like Henderson/Kane did well (despite a poorer final game from Kane). So going back to the start of my post. Alli and Lingard was where we lost it really and they were too anonymous for too much of the time. Loftus Cheek deserves a run instead of Alli from now on (he did from the second game onwards really).
Agree with all of that. At this level it is about making the big decisions over team selection and I thought Southgate got sucked into past England managers' trend of sticking to the same team and not resting any of his "main" players if needed as for several of those players it was clear it was one game too many. Loftus Cheek, for example, might have added another dimension. Can't help thinking a player like Wilshire in the squad might have given us some much needed added flair and just something different.
 

nick logan

Well-known member
Joined
6 Apr 2000
Messages
30,544
Reaction score
84
Location
Essex
Well done Gareth and the boys and thanks for a tremendous month.

This is the start not the end.

Football came home as England are important to people again.

:sorted:
 

jlove

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2002
Messages
32,307
Reaction score
122
Location
Vaison-la-Romaine
I was surprised that we didn't alter tactics yesterday to stop the incessant attacking along our flanks.
I got the impression that Alli and Lingard were asked to play wider to pin the full-backs but it's not their style of play and they were forever drifting inside. Croatia's wide men swapped sides at half-time and there was certainly a deliberate tactic to swing the ball from side to side to keep overloading and crossing the ball in.
 

malagakid

Active member
Joined
10 Feb 2015
Messages
3,416
Reaction score
0
I think we will develop to play 4-3-3 but he’s got it right for now imo.
 

Fairless

Member
Joined
17 Jul 2018
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I think it was a combination of being lucky and actually having a plan and executing it well. I just hope Southgate will develop as a manager in the coming months, otherwise this team will stagnate big time.
 

ruislip bee

Well-known member
Joined
25 Apr 2009
Messages
20,133
Reaction score
49
I think it was a combination of being lucky and actually having a plan and executing it well. I just hope Southgate will develop as a manager in the coming months, otherwise this team will stagnate big time.
Yep our old CEO used to say a bad plan executed well was better than a good plan executed badly. But step one was definitely having a plan!
 

Les Beeavinu

Boredom buddy
Joined
5 Aug 2002
Messages
55,302
Reaction score
230
Location
Sandhurst
Good to see this impressive man taking n the failing academy system in this country. Good for him.
 

IDontBeeLieveIt

Well-known member
Joined
6 Dec 2013
Messages
14,722
Reaction score
0
How about have a rule that any English player under the age of 22, who does not get 900 minutes of first team football during the past two years, should immediately be allowed to leave for £0 to a lower division club.
That would perk things up, and get a few more of the promising Premiership youngsters into a club who'll actually play them, and the best ones they'll have to pay very good wages to in order to keep them.
 

HertfordBee

Active member
Joined
2 Oct 2003
Messages
5,375
Reaction score
0
Location
Surrey
Might also be worth realising that with these England games no longer be shown on domestic TV, interest in the national team is likely to wane further.
 

nick logan

Well-known member
Joined
6 Apr 2000
Messages
30,544
Reaction score
84
Location
Essex
Might also be worth realising that with these England games no longer be shown on domestic TV, interest in the national team is likely to wane further.
eh ? we just got to a semi final and the interest is the highest for years and years
 

wanderer paul

https://brentfordfcmemorabilia.wordpress.com/
Joined
28 Oct 2002
Messages
48,849
Reaction score
171
Location
Brentford
eh ? we just got to a semi final and the interest is the highest for years and years
Stick it on terrestrial tv then. England (well the FA) keep selling their souls to Sky. Back into the doldrums then.
 

HertfordBee

Active member
Joined
2 Oct 2003
Messages
5,375
Reaction score
0
Location
Surrey
eh ? we just got to a semi final and the interest is the highest for years and years
Not for all the millions who would have watched tomorrow but now won't. Surely it should have been about building on the World Cup and promoting it, not shoving the game into a back cupboard?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top Bottom