Yes, when they showed his eyes open when he hit the ground it was obviously something very very bad.Disgusting how the tv cameras are playing this out...
They are showing too much.
That replay was horrific, his glazed eyes![]()
Disgusting how the tv cameras are playing this out...
They are showing too much.
That replay was horrific, his glazed eyes![]()
Link???German football website writes there was a "thumbs ups" from the medics...
Several plans in on the chest compressions and defib?It's easy to blame the broadcasters, uncertain as to what is happening on the pitch, torn between a reflexive instinct to report and the need for respect of player's privacy in a desperate situation. You yourself refer to the player's "glazed eyes", a detail we really didn't need but which you felt was your legitimate right to report.
The BBC, deciding there was nothing further to report, finally cut back to the studio where Lineker and co expressed their shock, their sorrow and their inability to know what to say. I felt they handled the situation with the decency and respect appropriate to the occasion. There's nothing much any of us can say except wait and hope for the best.
Agreed. Didn't see anything untoward in BBC coverage; no replays, no focus on face, nothing except sensible coverage in a vey horrible situation.The BBC, deciding there was nothing further to report, finally cut back to the studio where Lineker and co expressed their shock, their sorrow and their inability to know what to say. I felt they handled the situation with the decency and respect appropriate to the occasion. There's nothing much any of us can say except wait and hope for the best.
It's from Kicker -- should be reliable: Liveticker | Dänemark - Finnland 0:0 | Vorrunde, 1. Spieltag | Europameisterschaft 2021Link???
an encouraging photo but who knows
Surely going straight back to the studio would have been the best cause of action.Agreed. Didn't see anything untoward in BBC coverage; no replays, no focus on face, nothing except sensible coverage in a vey horrible situation.
Sure, but 20/20 hindsight is a great thing. That's all I'm going to say now. A man's life has just been saved. Thank God and whoever else you pray to.Surely going straight back to the studio would have been the best cause of action.
These people are journalists. It's their job to report, to bear witness. It's their basic instinct, ingrained over years of training. They have to make important decisions within seconds as to how to handle a delicate situation. Go on reporting? Risk intruding? Turn away from a scene where a tragedy may be unfolding? Would you have done any better?Surely going straight back to the studio would have been the best cause of action.
Though I was nervous for a few seconds when I saw Micah "laugh hysterically at everything" Richards sat there.Surely going straight back to the studio would have been the best cause of action.
As you say, his life is all thay matters.Sure, but 20/20 hindsight is a great thing. That's all I'm going to say now. A man's life has just been saved. Thank God and whoever else you pray to.
It was shocking mate, they should have cut away 20 minutes earlier. That doesn’t mean people aren’t worried about Christian as well, you can think both things.f*** sake, stop moaning about the coverage. I think there is more to worry about here!
Probably not even the BBC directing the cameras. Hard to know what was happening to begin with, but they didn't show anything else once it was apparent how serious it was. Honestly, some people will use any stick to beat the BBC with.These people are journalists. It's their job to report, to bear witness. It's their basic instinct, ingrained over years of training. They have to make important decisions within seconds as to how to handle a delicate situation. Go on reporting? Risk intruding? Turn away from a scene where a tragedy may be unfolding? Would you have done any better?
Me too, good to see.This shook me.
It definitely isn't. It will be a single feed for all broadcasters.Probably not even the BBC directing the cameras.
I have morals and respect.These people are journalists. It's their job to report, to bear witness. It's their basic instinct, ingrained over years of training. They have to make important decisions within seconds as to how to handle a delicate situation. Go on reporting? Risk intruding? Turn away from a scene where a tragedy may be unfolding? Would you have done any better?
They didn't go back to the studio for at least five minutes after you saw the medical team pumping his heart.Probably not even the BBC directing the cameras. Hard to know what was happening to begin with, but they didn't show anything else once it was apparent how serious it was. Honestly, some people will use any stick to beat the BBC with.
I'm no lip reading or body language expert but he was very good in that entire situation. Thank god Eriksen is okFair play to Anthony Taylor. Four seconds from when Ericson hit the ground to him blowing the whistle to get the medical team in.
I'd say the same if it was sky or ITV.Probably not even the BBC directing the cameras. Hard to know what was happening to begin with, but they didn't show anything else once it was apparent how serious it was. Honestly, some people will use any stick to beat the BBC with.
Personally I found a close up of his face whilst he was dying, several zoomed in shots of CPR, his team mates surrounding him with tears in their eyes visibly shaking and his wife collapsing in the arms of Jasper shmeichal a bit untoward but maybe thats just me.Agreed. Didn't see anything untoward in BBC coverage; no replays, no focus on face, nothing except sensible coverage in a vey horrible situation.
You had a simple choice to turn off too. You didn't. Holier than thou.I'd say the same if it was sky or ITV.
The person in charge of the programme should have switched to the studio.
Simple choice...
Show footage of man potentially dying before our eyes, panning in on his stricken wife etc.
Or
Make Gary and the boys/girls fill the air time a d keep us informed.