Wouldn't be surprised at all. He's not getting a look in at all at BFC - needs to get some games, match fitness and a bit of confidence.
Just waiting for the clearance.So, did he go to Twente? Haven't seen anything official on it. Presumably he's still here?
Blimey, your Dutch is very good Wanderer. Thank you.Just waiting for the clearance.
This is the translation of the post from yesterday.
BREAKING: FC Twente agree with Dervisoglu and Brentford FC
Jan Streuer has today reached an agreement with Brentford FC and Dervisoglu. The 20-year-old attacker must provide the team with extra creative impulses.
"With that we have the two creative players that we wanted to have", says Streuer, who knows that Dervisoglu played at Sparta mainly as a forward. "But we think he can also play very well at 10."
Dervisoglu is rented for one season. FC Twente has had to renounce an option to buy. "Unfortunately, it is far too expensive for us," said Streuer in conversation with Ten Voorde of TC Tubantia.
With the arrival of Dervisoglu, FC Twente is ready on the transfer market. The club will only come into action if a major player decides to leave the club. The chance that this will happen is quite small.
He's only been with us since January..Very confused about this one.
We haven't really seen him play apart from a couple of cameos but the club have had him for awhile so i'm in no doubt they know what they're doing.
Valencia had more game time and the consensus on here was he wasn't quite up to it so maybe that's an indication.
I don't think that's the case. I think the whole Covid lockdown thing has hit his development with us so he's a bit behind where we want him to be. Sure he'll do well in Holland and we'll take it from there...
A loan in League One would be better for his development if a team there wanted him and we see him as a future first teamer. A loan to the Eredivisie might be a better guarantee of playing time and an opportunity for him to excel, and so increase the chances we will make our money back, which probably tells a story.I just dont understand this, what is the point of him going to a league we know he can perform in already. Look what a loan in this country has done for Fross. Score goals in division one and that will do alot more then playing in a league you already know.
Because he won’t be coming back?!I just dont understand this, what is the point of him going to a league we know he can perform in already. Look what a loan in this country has done for Fross. Score goals in division one and that will do alot more then playing in a league you already know.
All I would say is that he doesn't really seem to have been given chances. I'm not sure TF knew where/how to play him. Can only assume he looked poor in training. That's a lot of money for someone who we don't seem to have given a chance to, so not sure what happened with out usual due diligence in scouting.I don't understand some comments on here and social media. He hasn't pulled up trees when he has been given chances just like Valencia. Lack of game time to adapt and show his worth.
He was always going to take a little while to adapt to our style. People forget he's only been here since Jan, so would have had 3 months of training the Brentford way then another few months doing nothing. Then he'll have not got much in the way of integration with the squad as they'll have been playing every other day. Back into a very short pre-season and the form of Forss and signing of Toney means he's still some way behind. Would be a shame if we've given up on him as he looks like he's got a lot about him. The reports from Twente said that they wanted a option to sign but they couldn't afford the v high figure we were quoting. That doesn't sound like we've given up on him entirely so maybe there's hope he'll come back from loan rejuvenated..All I would say is that he doesn't really seem to have been given chances. I'm not sure TF knew where/how to play him. Can only assume he looked poor in training. That's a lot of money for someone who we don't seem to have given a chance to, so not sure what happened with out usual due diligence in scouting.
Ironically, if he's signed for the BFC of a few years ago, pre Watkins, Benrahma and Maupay, he would have got a lot more opportunities in the first team and I'm sure we would have seen a player grown in stature, confidence & quality. But he was never going to get that chance post lockdown and now, unless he set the world alight in 10 minute sub appearances - and who does that? Poor fella couldn't even make the squad.
And I would agree with a couple of others - loaning back to Holland indicates he ain't coming back.
Well when Kane was going on loan to Millwall or Norwich, he wasn't exactly seen as a future superstar...He seems the sort of player that gets better in the minds of our fans the less he plays.... according to sum on twitter we’ve just loaned out Harry Kane.
No, I think we'd tracked him for a while. If we'd wanted him as back up we'd have paid the extra to get him in in August. The fact we let him play on in Holland until Jan suggests he's one we're happy to develop long term which is why I think he'll be back after this loan..I think Halil was essentially signed because Watkin's ability as a striker was still somewhat unknown and we essentially covered ourselves by planning to bring him over in January in case we needed a plan B/C in addition to Watkins and Karelis.
Watkins performing above and beyond all expectation unfortunately almost made Halil redundant before he'd even arrived.