Final Score Latest: Brentford 2 (Janelt, Toney) v QPR 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

TW1Bee

Active member
Joined
28 Mar 2005
Messages
5,799
Reaction score
104
Location
Strawberry Hill, Twickenham
Should have been a goal there. Janelt as the 4 was not shielding.

Sorenson needs to come off. He should have been sent off.

Marcondes needs to come off. I don’t know what his role in the team is and neither does he.

QPR are playing really well. We are poor.
No way a red it was a 50/50 chase and MBS leaned in to him Dykes never had possesion and you can't say it was goal scoring opportunity.
 

Beeswaxnees

Member
Joined
15 Apr 2017
Messages
418
Reaction score
37
Janelt is absolute class. Great ball for Mbeumo in injury time whose first touch lets him down. Winnable but we need to change Sorenson and possibly Marcondes if Jensen has the legs.
Agree, but never done well against Osoi-samuel fo there goal
 

jbee

Active member
Joined
22 Oct 2003
Messages
3,789
Reaction score
497
Location
Ealing
I do not like these changes. I assume they are injury based.
 

grutter

Active member
Joined
27 Aug 2011
Messages
7,348
Reaction score
393
Well, I wasn't expecting that. It's either a tactical master stroke that will see us win the midfield battle, or a complete gamble for which pelters may be thrown later.
 

Dazza

Active member
Joined
5 Sep 2006
Messages
1,646
Reaction score
344
Location
Twickenham
Marcondes right wing back? What? Fosu did well at RB in the Fulham game - stick him there and let Marcodes be playing off Toney surely?
 

Bridge Bee

Active member
Joined
13 Apr 2009
Messages
3,273
Reaction score
94
This looks like suicide to me. 3 wasn’t enough in midfield now we have 2. And a wing back who’s not a wing back.

Fingers crossed.
 

Leonardo

Mad blogger
Joined
25 Jun 2001
Messages
5,875
Reaction score
163
Location
Burnham
Who is right wing back? Can't fathom it although Dalsgaard was poor and DaSilva not 100%
 

shaun

Active member
Joined
17 May 2002
Messages
3,566
Reaction score
51
Location
Southfields
What a load of crap. He's the only one pressing or getting close to Toney, has been involved in most of our best attacking play...
Of course Marcondes should have done better with that, though he did win the ball to get into the position. However, if you didn't see any of the positive things he did I can only assume your mind is fixed and eyes closed. The brilliant crossfield ball to Fosu which created the first chance and his role in the build up to the goal were two thinsgs you must have seen. A lot of the other link up play perhaps not if you weren't looking but my feeling was his display and an improved effort from Bryan were positives fro the half.
 

Nada Bee

Well-known member
Joined
10 Aug 2001
Messages
17,596
Reaction score
373
Location
Aveley
Oh no. Oh no.

we haven’t gone 3-5-2 / 5-3-2 again have we.

it looks like it. There isn’t any width.
 

shaun

Active member
Joined
17 May 2002
Messages
3,566
Reaction score
51
Location
Southfields
Of course Marcondes should have done better with that, though he did win the ball to get into the position. However, if you didn't see any of the positive things he did I can only assume your mind is fixed and eyes closed. The brilliant crossfield ball to Fosu which created the first chance and his role in the build up to the goal were two thinsgs you must have seen. A lot of the other link up play perhaps not if you weren't looking but my feeling was his display and an improved effort from Bryan were positives fro the half.
 

Dazza

Active member
Joined
5 Sep 2006
Messages
1,646
Reaction score
344
Location
Twickenham
I'm baffled by the changes, if they work than fair play - none of us called it 😂
 

shaun

Active member
Joined
17 May 2002
Messages
3,566
Reaction score
51
Location
Southfields
Of course Marcondes should have done better with that, though he did win the ball to get into the position. However, if you didn't see any of the positive things he did I can only assume your mind is fixed and eyes closed. The brilliant crossfield ball to Fosu which created the first chance and his role in the build up to the goal were two thinsgs you must have seen. A lot of the other link up play perhaps not if you weren't looking but my feeling was his display and an improved effort from Bryan were positives fro the half.
His role in the build up to the goal At least 4(?) other players touched it before the ball went in. 😀

As for his link up play. Yeah. I missed that alright.
 

Leonardo

Mad blogger
Joined
25 Jun 2001
Messages
5,875
Reaction score
163
Location
Burnham
If Canos had come on for Fosu he could play right wing back. Now that would make sense
 

Nada Bee

Well-known member
Joined
10 Aug 2001
Messages
17,596
Reaction score
373
Location
Aveley
Should be 2-1. But maybe just maybe Toney was 0.0000000001mm offside
 

Bixer

Active member
Joined
29 Sep 2014
Messages
2,062
Reaction score
78
Location
Isleworth
It’s as tight as you’ll get and the linesman’s basically just got lucky there, but by the letter of the law that was definitely offside
 

mhead bee

Well-known member
Joined
7 Apr 2000
Messages
24,915
Reaction score
990
Location
Maidenhead
No way a red it was a 50/50 chase and MBS leaned in to him Dykes never had possesion and you can't say it was goal scoring opportunity.
I think you are on your own on that one mate, well not completely, the ref and you agree.
 

jbee

Active member
Joined
22 Oct 2003
Messages
3,789
Reaction score
497
Location
Ealing
At least we look better on the ball now. This half is going to be fun for neutrals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom