That's really horrible.
You were lucky that they didn't take anything, but the thought of someone being in your home is horrible.That is just sh*t.
A ) Living very close to Manchester, car crime up here is rife. We read everyday that cars are being stolen and that is within a 3 mile radius of where I live.
B) We were broken into 6 weeks ago attempting to steal my car, fortunately didn’t get away with anything, but the event was and still is very disturbing.
A mixture of Scrotes breaking in to get money to cover their next fix and organised gangs targeting cars to order.
The lengths I have had to go to to make sure the house and cars are secure is ridiculous but necessary in the current day.
Hope others do not have to go through what we went through and his folks are ok and the cars are recovered quickly.
Wonder if he actually owned them or were they provided for him.Horrible thing to happen.
Sums up modern football though that a fella can afford 2 motors like that and plays maybe 3 games a year.
Mind boggling.
His wife might be a top executive at a multi-national companies earning millions.Horrible thing to happen.
Sums up modern football though that a fella can afford 2 motors like that and plays maybe 3 games a year.
Mind boggling.
Back to the old mechanical locks seems to be the way to goCar crime seems to be rife at the moment. Thanks fk I put a new krooklok on my Scenic.
sh*t K, that sounds awful. Hope L and H ok ?That is just sh*t.
A ) Living very close to Manchester, car crime up here is rife. We read everyday that cars are being stolen and that is within a 3 mile radius of where I live.
B) We were broken into 6 weeks ago attempting to steal my car, fortunately didn’t get away with anything, but the event was and still is very disturbing.
A mixture of Scrotes breaking in to get money to cover their next fix and organised gangs targeting cars to order.
The lengths I have had to go to to make sure the house and cars are secure is ridiculous but necessary in the current day.
Hope others do not have to go through what we went through and his folks are ok and the cars are recovered quickly.
We ok ta, will catch up soon.sh*t K, that sounds awful. Hope L and H ok ?
Isn’t he usually the captain and most senior player in our cup games?Interesting that he was made Captain today......
Not sure.....Isn’t he usually the captain and most senior player in our cup games?
He was captain for the Oxford game too I think.Isn’t he usually the captain and most senior player in our cup games?
Played well today. Also, could hear him talking/motivating the team in the last 10 mins.Great save today in normal time and in shoot out.. good guy to have around
Yes captained the cup games he played in last season tooNot sure.....
Hadn't noticed before tbh.
Exactly what you want from a number 2 'keeper – completely dependable.Personally, I don't think he's ever let us down, and yes I'm aware that he's only had a handful of games.
![]()
I had him in front of Bentley for the whole of the latter’s final season, myself. I felt he punched, when he should have caught a cross from their left in the first half, but he doesn’t let you down.Exactly what you want from a number 2 'keeper – completely dependable.
He is a very decent No.2 keeper to have and if Raya isn't ready for whatever reason against Brum I would have no concerns about Daniels stepping in. I think most of us think he should have had a run of games when Bentley was throwing them into his own next for fun in season 2018/19. However he remained professional, never Complained & has never let the side down, have a lot of time for the bloke.Exactly what you want from a number 2 'keeper – completely dependable.
If we wanted a goalkeeper pure and simple then he is excellent. Problem is that we want more beginning with distribution from the back and a keeper who also acts as a sweeper.If you looked at what Daniels did yesterday, it was everything you could ask for in a goalkeeper. He stopped shots, saved a penalty, commanded his penalty area, shouted at his defenders, distributed the ball well, and was calm.
There was a powerful shot that came in from the right in the second half. It could have crept in at the near post, but Daniels covered it well with a great save.
To me Raya is a “Benrahma" type keeper, animated, skilful, and great at getting everyone to notice what he does in a very noticeable type of goalkeeping.
Whereas, Daniels is very much a "Norgaard" type player -skilful, dependable, doing the hard work, less glamorous, more serious, but actually doing as much work and contribution, but in a less than always obvious way.
If Daniels became our regular first team keeper, then I would be happy with that!
I thought he did that well yesterday, plus he only had 2 of our normal back 4 playing in front of him, with the experience of Pontus and Henrik missing.If we wanted a goalkeeper pure and simple then he is excellent. Problem is that we want more beginning with distribution from the back and a keeper who also acts as a sweeper.
and one of the two playing playing out of positionplus he only had 2 of our normal back 4 playing in front of him, with the experience of Pontus and Henrik missing.
There was a few occassions when it needed a quick throw out to get us started on a counter attack, and he just held onto the ball.Excellent save today, but he was a little slow to spot the Birmingham goalscorer moving into an unmarked position and adjust his position from goal centre accordingly; he doesn't create enough from his goalmouth distribution, as it is usually rather tame rollouts or short passes.
He is the goal keeper and it is a defenders Job to mark the opposition so I can not agree that he was a fault at all for the goalExcellent save today, but he was a little slow to spot the Birmingham goalscorer moving into an unmarked position and adjust his position from goal centre accordingly; he doesn't create enough from his goalmouth distribution, as it is usually rather tame rollouts or short passes.
What Daniels??!Dependable goalkeeper but not as quick with his feet as Raya. Unfortunately , we lose that quick movement forward that Raya gives us but one is valued at £10 million compared to Luke who is reliable and obviously happy to be a number 2.
No way should we be going in with him as our No 1 if we are targeting promotion IMO.He played fine but we’d probably have had a bit more zip in starting attacks with Raya. If it comes down to having him as our number one he won’t let us down but the outfield players will need to do more work to find openings.
Oh I agree we need Raya but if he goes and we don’t buy someone who can immediately replace his quality we could rejig to be fine with Daniels.No way should we be going in with him as our No 1 if we are targeting promotion IMO.
That can be taught into him surely?He played fine but we’d probably have had a bit more zip in starting attacks with Raya.
Taught into him? He is 33 next January surely a little late to change very much.That can be taught into him surely?
He's been at the club how long now?Taught into him? He is 33 next January surely a little late to change very much.
Why ? What has Luke Daniels done wrong in the 2 games he’s played this season. Maybe the only real difference between the two is Raya does look to move his ball quickerOh I agree we need Raya but if he goes and we don’t buy someone who can immediately replace his quality we could rejig to be fine with Daniels.
He’s done nothing wrong. I’ve said we could he fine with him but would need to alter our play elsewhere to compensate for him being less good with the ball at his feet than Raya. That adds a dimension to our play which the club has clearly been keen on- I think it broke Bentley trying to adapt to it.Why ? What has Luke Daniels done wrong in the 2 games he’s played this season. Maybe the only real difference between the two is Raya does look to move his ball quicker