Stoke 3 - 2 Brentford (Forss(2))

Status
Not open for further replies.

Easter 1959

Active member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
2,942
Reaction score
261
Location
Cornwall
Brentford: Raya; Dalsgaard, Pinnock, Sorensen, Henry; Goode, Janelt, Dasilva; Canos, Ghoddos, Toney
Subs: Daniels, Thompson, Jensen, Forss, Mbeumo, Fosu, Hammar

Stoke City: Davies; Collins, Souttar, Chester; Smith, Obi Mikel, Thompson, Brown; McClean, Campbell, Fletcher
Subs: Gunn, Baath, Vokes, Gregory, Oakley-Boothe, Powell, Tymon
 

Leedsbee

Active member
Joined
17 Nov 2006
Messages
1,497
Reaction score
423
Quite difficult to work out how we'll set up from that.3-5-2?
 

magicbees

Active member
Joined
5 Jul 2006
Messages
5,494
Reaction score
236
Location
Earley
Would guess 5 at the back, cant believe Goode is playing in midfield with Jenson on the bench.
 

ManorBee

formerly known as 'dblackshire'
Joined
21 Feb 2003
Messages
79
Reaction score
89
Will all the changes upset our passing game. Not got the players to retain the ball as we normally do
 

jlove

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2002
Messages
36,109
Reaction score
3,594
Location
Vaison-la-Romaine
Stoke have played with 3 CB's for a while so I guess we're matching up.
 
Joined
23 May 2000
Messages
18,386
Reaction score
1,657
It is probably going to be a second ball battle so we need to fiend our strongest players.
 

Dazza

Active member
Joined
5 Sep 2006
Messages
1,839
Reaction score
680
Location
Twickenham
With our midfield options spread so thin right now I think we might see this formation a handful of times in the coming weeks. Until one of Marcondes, Baptise and Norgaard returns we can't really expect Janelt, Josh and Jensen to play 90 minutes every 3 days or so (add in Jensen and Josh also playing international football too)
 

Dazza

Active member
Joined
5 Sep 2006
Messages
1,839
Reaction score
680
Location
Twickenham
Looks like 5-2-3 to me. I'm worried that we will get overrun in midfield, but hope to be proven wrong.

I mean I think it's quite clearly the 343 from a couple of season's ago/start of last season 🤷‍♂️
 

GABS

Active member
Joined
17 Apr 2000
Messages
7,972
Reaction score
1,240
We can bring on 3 attacking subs near the end when 1 nil down to a Stoke bundled header and go into that crazy kamikaze attack formation we used in the final mins at the end of last season v Stoke/Barnsley/Fulham 😊
 

upnorthbee

Active member
Joined
3 Jan 2006
Messages
2,221
Reaction score
1,147
Location
Singapore
Absolutely fine with trying something new against this lot. Remember the games at the end of the season where we all wished there was a plan B? This is our Plan B, very happy to see us trying it at Stoke, all things considered.
 

grutter

Active member
Joined
27 Aug 2011
Messages
7,348
Reaction score
399
We can bring on 3 attacking subs near the end when 1 nil down to a Stoke bundled header and go into that crazy kamikaze attack formation we used in the final mins at the end of last season v Stoke/Barnsley/Fulham 😊
Yeah, cos that turned out well in all three of those games!
 

cromerbee

...we are the Royal Oak, Griffin Park.
Joined
13 Dec 2007
Messages
5,188
Reaction score
571
Location
Felpham, W.Sussex
Good looking team for the game considering injuries etc. Usual w a nky comments on Twitter!!!
 
Joined
12 Sep 2020
Messages
175
Reaction score
172
Location
Someone’s Head
Don’t really trust Goode or Sorensen as centre backs in a back two, glad Frank has gone for a back 3.

Though I think we could have stuck Dalsgaard at right centre back and moved Canos to RWB
 

Leonardo

Mad blogger
Joined
25 Jun 2001
Messages
6,614
Reaction score
731
Location
Burnham
Don’t really trust Goode or Sorensen as centre backs in a back two, glad Frank has gone for a back 3.

Though I think we could have stuck Dalsgaard at right centre back and moved Canos to RWB
I totally agree with that and would have had Fosu start
 
OP
E

Easter 1959

Active member
Joined
13 Jan 2008
Messages
2,942
Reaction score
261
Location
Cornwall
Is there no free audio commentary on ifollow??
Strange; I have just looked and it is not there; I have a Season Audio pass as well; although this afternoon I have spend the £10 to watch so no personal impact.
 

AB

Well-known member
Joined
12 Apr 2000
Messages
15,026
Reaction score
5,798
Location
'Sunny' Leeds
Yeah, cos that turned out well in all three of those games!
Then it was a desperate last throw with a back 3 including Norgaard, at least it seems today to be something planned for and capable of execution with three actual CBs to prevent a sucker punch.
 
Joined
4 Oct 2008
Messages
821
Reaction score
730
Location
Woolpit, Suffark
We can bring on 3 attacking subs near the end when 1 nil down to a Stoke bundled header and go into that crazy kamikaze attack formation we used in the final mins at the end of last season v Stoke/Barnsley/Fulham 😊
It’s the formation we should have adopted in those three games when things weren’t going so well.
Can be a very attacking formation and definitely gives more help in midfield.
Good to see TF etc being flexible.
 

Wooburn Bee

Active member
Joined
22 Feb 2006
Messages
3,417
Reaction score
561
Generally I hate it when we play with three centre backs but against Stoke away it might work.

Probably a needs must scenario given injuries and knocks. Ghoddos will have to play a critical role in providing creativity in attacking third and providing link between midfield and Toney.
 

Delbee

Active member
Joined
14 Nov 2006
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
748
Location
West Middlesex
Agent Mepham doesn’t understand the rule , scored Bournemouth’s equaliser I. 6th minute of added time

We win by 2 clear goals and we go above Bournemouth, equal points and goals if it a win by 1 goal
 

seanrs

Active member
Joined
17 Oct 2006
Messages
2,308
Reaction score
435
I don’t like playing 3 CBs but probably needs must. As others have mentioned had we gone to 3 CBs when Norgaard went off, we may well have held on against Preston
 

Rob-BEE

Buzzing
Joined
20 Jan 2016
Messages
873
Reaction score
529
Location
West Byfleet
Don’t really trust Goode or Sorensen as centre backs in a back two, glad Frank has gone for a back 3.

Though I think we could have stuck Dalsgaard at right centre back and moved Canos to RWB
I thought so too re Canos - I guess that will be our plan B if things aren't going so well. That said, Dalsgaard is pretty good going forwards
 

Kingston Bee

Active member
Joined
22 Oct 2008
Messages
6,509
Reaction score
1,036
Location
Kingston-Upon-Thames
A more tighter, defensive lineup, in comparison to last season. Hopefully a case of lessons learned. Don't have a problem with the lineup given the players available.
 

Stanley

Well-known member
Joined
10 Jan 2001
Messages
14,012
Reaction score
498
3-4-3 for sure. Looks like TF has set out the team looking at how Stoke play and used it for some much needed squad rotation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom