http://www.standamf.com/2015/09/12/benhams-brentford-from-issue-14/?utm_content=buffer18e98&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
linky no worky

linky no worky
Am I going mad or is Must read 2.0 the same as Must Read 1.0?

No, no. Must Read 1.0 was this http://www.goaldentimes.org/slow-steadyand-data-may-just-do-the-trick-for-brentford-fc/ which is rather sh*t compared with Must Read 2.0.
Must Read 2.0 only appeared on the Must Read 1.0 thread in post no.9.
I am glad this now has it's own thread.![]()
Yes - sorry
I thought Must Read 2.0 was much better than Must Read 1.0 so set up this Must Read 2.0 thread to highlight it better.![]()
IMBWT

Am I going mad or is Must read 2.0 the same as Must Read 1.0?