I think this trend of wearing an 'away' kit regardless of a colour clash is getting a bit much now.
Many clubs have iconic kits, even in our division we have Leeds and Norwich and i'm sure their fans hate their team wearing an unfamiliar kit EVERY away game.
Chelsea's away kit is a blue/black concoction and Portsmouth last year had a dark blue away kit. Surely just as much of a clash when playing a team in blue than their 1st. kits.
Port Vale turned up at Bury on saturday with their 'away' kit, even though their white shirts didn't clash with Burys horendous blue and dark claret halved shirts. The ref said their 'away' kit clashed so had to wear training t-shirts for the game, no numbers, sponsors, just a white t-shirt, it looked like a kick about with your mates!
When i used to run a football team at the start of each season we had to register our kit and change strip with the league secretary. We were then given details of every other clubs kits.
Surely professional clubs must have a similar system.
I think it's time for legislation now.
1st kit should always be worn, home and away unless there is a definate colour clash and that decision should be made by the referee not a clubs comercial manager.
Away game sponsors names can be put on the 1st kit just as easy as on an 'away' shirt.
I loved our all white 2nd. kit under Martin Allen and i remember him saying at the time that Brentford colours are red, white and black so we'll have a white 2nd. kit and a black 3rd. kit.
With a white change kit this year we would only have had to wear it 6 times in the league.
Some may argue that this may make it less commercial but didn't it sell out more than once when we wore it before and how many times did the team actually turn out in it?