HertfordBee
INVALID EMAIL
BU Comms
I didn't hear it but I imagine that it went something like this :
1) The Club has been in a mess for years and living beyond its means.
2) We are very lucky indeed to have the financial backing of a longtime supporter who is prepared to spend his own monies rather than ours.....not that there's any of ours left.......Noades did most of the job and just trying to survive after he pulled the plug.....(translation.... ran out of overdraft wriggle room in March 2003)......finished off any remaining equity in the Griffin Park asset.
3) If Matthew Benham had not stepped in then we would never have been able to do the Noades deal in January 2006 and in this writers view would have gone into administration in early 2006 or alternatively 'sold out' to a Noades Mark 2.
3) A succession of incompetent MD's/CEO's each handpicked to be worse than his predecessor speeded up the process a bit but given the way that the Club had been neglected and mismanaged over probably five or six decades we could have had Warren Buffett in and he'd have given up the ghost.
4) We now have an 'benefactor/investor' in the true sense of the word who doesn't want to be pictured strolling round Griffin Park holding up a giant cardboard cheque for £5,000,000 or being photographed with the team manager.
5) We do not have 'The Matthew Benham Stand' but he is content that it be called 'The Bees United Stand' and that is the measure of the man.
6) Matthew Benham deserves the maximum support and appreciation which doesn't mean wearing soppy white wigs (not that he's got grey hair yet but he soon will have) but it does mean supporting the club as best people are able and according to your individual means.
7) Neither Matthew Benham nor any of his people have ever written an article telling us how great he is nor slagged off supporters by calling them 'thick prats' and other lovely names.
8) Matthew Benham has never attempted to divide the supporter base........that was Noades genius......any article or comment was either dismissed as being by a 'thick prat' or he would seize on some uncrossed 't' or undotted 'i' and set his legal people on the case. We even had an article in the programme as we were gazing at the wreckage we had been left with telling us how good Noades had been for Brentford...... (coming soon to a programme near you...... an in depth analysis on what a difference Bernard Matthews has made to the lives of turkeys).
9) Finally if any Brentford supporters out there still don't know how lucky they are to still have a club welcome back from your trip to Planet Mars.
Did it sound something like that?
I realise that you are probably looking to concentrate your efforts a bit less widely than you have been doing on all our behalves for the last few years, but is there no way you could squeeze out a little bit more time for a consultancy role with the communication machines from both organisations??
Your posts alone - tone, style and content - make this board worth visiting Not that there was anything in the above post that should have been news to anyone, but for an ability to produce in a paragraph what others take a week wading through mud to replicate ... thanks!!

