http://football.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/0,1563,410883,00.htmlI always thought it was stonewall not stonecold, am I wrong or is the great Umondo wrong?
I always thought it was stonewall not stonecol
two highly marginal claims for themselve

lol Everton a little club :scratch:
by the way, Thorpe is a big reason that we aren't lower down the table.![]()
You are 100% certain that the two players went down because Carragher pulled them down rather than Lescott leant back into Carragher, are you? I've seen it a dozen times and despite what the punters have said, I reckon it would have looked the same if it was Lescott's fault.
Thought he got it spot on, to be honest.
Clattenburg is a ****, he got so many decisions wrong in my eyes.
he didnt touch him though and it wasnt a vicious lunge
he didnt touch him though and it wasnt a vicious lunge
Have you heard of the word intent. It's in the laws of the game. You can be dismissed for throwing a punch and it not connecting.
Anyone going two feet off the ground should be dismissed and I'm amazed he didn't walk for it.
Theres no intent in the laws was taken out a few years ago. You can be penalized for attempting to trip, attempting to charge etc but there is no mention of intent.
But yes i agree he should have gone, it was probably this that got him taken off the prem not the penaltys
I'm sure Benitez can sort you out some tickets for a match.What about intentional handball?
Well Clattenburg would have been wrong not to send Hibburt off, wouldn't he? Maybe Gerrard said something like, "those observers will mark you down if you get this card the wrong colour?"
Gerrard more than likely said 'f'kin yellow' and he would have been right too
I see Clattenburg has a free weekend this coming weekend![]()

More likely because he is refereeing in Moscow on thursday than because if last saturday.![]()
clattenburg's one of the best in the prem, btw. he just had a bit of a mare![]()
I've always rated Clat as one of the best Ref's we've had in years