Howard Webb
Not wishing to be too picky, honestly, but dissent cannot be punished by a straight red card! Dissent is a cautionable offence
If it includes foul and abusive language in the dissent it can be a straight red.

Not wishing to be too picky, honestly, but dissent cannot be punished by a straight red card! Dissent is a cautionable offence

If it includes foul and abusive language in the dissent it can be a straight red.![]()
I agree BHS, Webb was exceptional as he refereed the final. He was exceptionally lenient to almost the entire Netherlands team who should have been reduced to eight men by the end of the match. Just because a ref can use his discretion that does not make every decision he makes a correct one.
So you would have prefered him to send of 3 Dutch players and create a complete farce of the final?
I feel he refereed the game with an awful lot of common sense.
I feel he refereed the game with an awful lot of common sense.
so both sides are criticising, one saying he was too harsh, the other saying he wasn't harsh enough.
so surely he did alright, really :shrug:
If he had red-carded the first offender there almost certainly wouldn't have been two more red-card offences. Also, since he had overlooked the first offender that doesn't mean he was right to overlook the second and third. Overall, his leniency seemed to have encouraged the Netherlanders to continue their violent tactics without recrimination.So you would have prefered him to send of 3 Dutch players and create a complete farce of the final?
I feel he refereed the game with an awful lot of common sense.
Not wishing to be too picky, honestly, but dissent cannot be punished by a straight red card! Dissent is a cautionable offence, and while you feel Webb possibly acted with discretion in not issuing a second caution when Robben kicked the ball away, I still feel he should have sent him off.
Imagine if it had gone to penalties and Robben had scored the winning kick!!
Still I guess it is all about opinions!
Also with Robben kicking the ball away, I thought HW dealt with it very well. Dissent is not an automatic yellow card,
He let robben off to avoid a red but the spanish guy got one because he hadnt offended beforehand.
.............................what about Iniesta's challenge well after the ball had gone - it wasn't even a footballing challenge, it was running up to the Dutch guy and giving him 'what-for'?............................
.......................now imagine Iniesta scoring the winning goal.....................![]()
seriously? Iniesta stuck his hip out while the guy ran past him. his hip!! are you suggesting that should've been a red-card?!?!
i remember one by the touchline where, after the ball had gone, Iniesta tripped the Dutch guy. the slow-mo showed him literally just barging him, or sticking out his hip, to ensure the Dutchie couldn't get past him, and of course the Dutchie went into a double-somersault and players converged on the ref.
it was a foul, it was off-the-ball, it was retaliation and it was aggressive. but lord help me if it was a red card.
so both sides are criticising, one saying he was too harsh, the other saying he wasn't harsh enough.
so surely he did alright, really :shrug:
it was a foul, it was off-the-ball, it was retaliation and it was aggressive. but lord help me if it was a red card.
...........................and as far as I recall, was missed by Webb - do you still think 'so surely he did alright, really'?..........................
I don't know if any other referee could have dealt with the final in a better way, all I think is that Webb was not up to the mark, in a number of situations.......................