aslan
Active member
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 7,864
- Reaction score
- 13,156
Igor Thiago
I don't think you need to be a doctor, or have much medical knowledge, to know the answer to that oneWhy was Djokovic back after 19 days?
I don't think you need to be a doctor, or have much medical knowledge, to know the answer to that oneWhy was Djokovic back after 19 days?
I guess adequate cover and good offer are both somewhat subjective. But imagine seeing it from a buyer’s perspective. If I’m not already in discussion with Bees, and I’ve now heard Igor news, naturally I’d expect a tougher negotiation. Whether or not that’s how we roll, that’s what we would expect from another club.So try and keep a player who will be more than likely hacked off because we may have turned down a good offer. Don't think we work like that, especially if we have more than adequate cover. I cannot see how his price would now go up, we want to sell him and he wants to leave, nothing has changed in that regard.
So you would be happy to keep and play a hacked off, de-motivated Toney.I guess adequate cover and good offer are both somewhat subjective. But imagine seeing it from a buyer’s perspective. If I’m not already in discussion with Bees, and I’ve now heard Igor news, naturally I’d expect a tougher negotiation. Whether or not that’s how we roll, that’s what we would expect from another club.
If an offer is received that Ivan finds attractive and suits the Club, there’s no way he’ll stay. Anything else is folly.So you would be happy to keep and play a hacked off, de-motivated Toney.
how do you know hes hacked off / de-motivated ?So you would be happy to keep and play a hacked off, de-motivated Toney.
?Not at all. You're one of the most negative posters on here, especially when we're losing. It's just the way you are.
I admire your optimism.These recovery timelines are only an estimate,everyone responds differently to treatment and recovery.Rather than be miserable i'll hope that he comes back ahead of schedule.
No! I’ve already said I think we should cash in a number of times. But you’ve got to think about all perspectives. Firstly, say we did accept £30-40 odd mill, considering we got Neal in to cover Ivan’s ban, it’s likely we would need another incoming up top. I’m sorry but if you’re playing 3 up top, leaving say KLP on the bench and THAT’s IT. By any measure that’s not adequate cover. Plus as a buyer the fact the player bought to replace my target is now off, shifts the context of the dealSo you would be happy to keep and play a hacked off, de-motivated Toney.
Yes true, and not be bothered about the big salary increase that he missed out on.how do you know hes hacked off / de-motivated ?
Imagine his motivation will be 120 million % to stay in England squad under the new manager
And just like Djokovic, if Igor does taken longer….Novak Djokovic was mentioned on here or another thread came back far quicker than anticipated and he's 37.
A different sport yes but i recken tennis is harder on the knees.
more guessworkYes true, and not be bothered about the big salary increase that he missed out on.
A good £15m-£20m knock to the price. We need to sell him this summer.IT until January would work if his attitude is good. It would give IT a few more matches in the shop window.
i am not sure it will effect the selling price too much if he proves himself in that time.
Yes. The season ends in January. Everyone knows that.
IT until January would work if his attitude is good. It would give IT a few more matches in the shop window.
i am not sure it will effect the selling price too much if he proves himself in that time.
Like last season, you mean?Time for some of these B teamers to step on and get a place on the bench.
So did DjokovicAnd just like Djokovic, if Igor does taken longer….
We’ll always have Wimbledon
Novak Djokovic was mentioned on here or another thread came back far quicker than anticipated and he's 37.
A different sport yes but i recken tennis is harder on the knees.
I like your optimism but given the recovery times of our other injured players I would be surprised if he is back by late 2024. Also, the fact he will have had barely any pre season he won't be able to play competitive games as soon as he comes back. Coupled with the fact it is a new player in a new league and needing the required time to adapt, I don't imagine he will have much impact this season. Certainly not before ChristmasI’m hoping and it’s probably being very optimistic that the time frame is worst case. If he comes back earlier that’s great if he doesn’t then that’s what we expected, I think the club would be very careful not to say his return is sooner and ends up longer as has happened before and leaves everyone frustrated. Like wise i understand they can’t put an exact time on it.
Surely the assessment given includes time to get fit to play?I like your optimism but given the recovery times of our other injured players I would be surprised if he is back by late 2024. Also, the fact he will have had barely any pre season he won't be able to play competitive games as soon as he comes back. Coupled with the fact it is a new player in a new league and needing the required time to adapt, I don't imagine he will have much impact this season. Certainly not before Christmas
Not sure tbh. I reckon it would be "best news possible" given our recent history re injuries.Surely the assessment given includes time to get fit to play?
Pinnock is booked in for that dateThis could easily have happened on 1st Sept
One of Thomas's failings last season was not giving the youngsters enough time on the bench and minutes on the pitch. He seems reluctant sometimes to give them that extra responsibility. I think he is improving on that though. Otherwise what's the point of the b teamLike last season, you mean?
Fingers crossed but I won't be banking on it. Always seems to be a lag between players being 'fit' and then then seeing them in the matchday squadSurely the assessment given includes time to get fit to play?
I would agree that "expected to return" to you and me and everyone else would mean being available for selection. But does it mean "expected to start"?The club statement said "The striker will now begin a period of recovery and rehabilitation and is expected to return towards the end of the year.". Why would they say he is expected to return when he isn't?
Of course and i have no idea on how either injuries compare but i still prefer to live in the sunshine rather than the upside down.A tear can vary in size.
I understand it...Not sure i understand people arguing about when exactly he'll be back, at this point. He'll be back when he's ready, we'll use other players until then. Come on lads, we've done all this before![]()
Yeah the lad Morgan seems to have made a bit of impression in preseason, so maybe he'll be an option. Or can MPH be one of the front 3?One of Thomas's failings last season was not giving the youngsters enough time on the bench and minutes on the pitch. He seems reluctant sometimes to give them that extra responsibility. I think he is improving on that though. Otherwise what's the point of the b team
IYKYK ?Say his name and he appears. I believe in Neil Maupay.
?????Is it possible the club is yanking everyone’s chains on this?
The possible unavailability of his replacement has already has had commentators shift their narrative about Ivan from “Brentford’ll need to drop his price” to “Brentford may resist a move”.
Along with limited news about Henry and Hickey, the rumour of Norgaard being sold, upcoming opponents may underestimate us as being weakened from last season and won’t get that impression taken away by seeing Thiago ripping up top level opponents in preseason and may see any tactical innovations in preseason as being just ways for us to eke out the depleted squad. Then BAM five straight wins to start the season.
His original injury was (I think) lateral hyper-extension of the knee joint.....that was what Club Brugge put out as a press release and there was no mention of any tear to the ligament structures.Has this been confirmed as a reoccurrence of the injury he suffered in May or a completely new one?
If it’s an unrelated new meniscus injury then that’s unbelievably bad luck.
If it’s a relapse of the same tear then questions have to be asked as to why he was brought back so soon as it looks really poor judgment now.
You'd hope they've remembered that exact scenario playing out last year though.If Ivan leaves then we are just one knock to Bryan away from an issue up front.
Yes I agreeAnd what if he continues to play as he did last year?