Les Beeavinu
Administrator
Ivan Toney (Various)
Not sure if anyone else has picked this up but I've seen rumours that some clubs might be looking at him.
Yes.Do we
a) get the highest value possible and sell in Jan, reinvest and and hope it pays off
b) take a significant drop in value in the summer (I think?) and count on him to score the goals to keep us safe.
Was looking for an A or B if truth be told. LolYes.
Problem with that is that if we get relegated his value will not be £20m higher regardless of how many goals he scores so doesn't benefit us really or are you saying the contract extension comes in the summer?c) Plays the rest of the season, helping us to stay up whilst scoring lots of goals. Signs an extension to his contract out of gratitude towards the club, all of which adds another 20 million to his value, for him to move on in the summer.
If he was going to sign a contract extension I'd suggest that would have happened in the days / weeks after his ban was imposed. There was no reason for anyone to wait until the ban expired (we establish that signing a contract is not football related activity) so I think that ship sailed a long time ago unfortunately.c) Plays the rest of the season, helping us to stay up whilst scoring lots of goals. Signs an extension to his contract out of gratitude towards the club, all of which adds another 20 million to his value, for him to move on in the summer.
We are not getting relegated.Problem with that is that if we get relegated his value will not be £20m higher regardless of how many goals he scores so doesn't benefit us really or are you saying the contract extension comes in the summer?
Agreed. Just cannot see anyone willing to pay what we would accept.Can't see him going in Jan .
Because it is Jan transfer window speculation not his player threadwhy do we have a new thread?
Yep won't get resolved either way early doors so it'll be constant speculation until the end of JanuaryAgreed. Just cannot see anyone willing to pay what we would accept.
I can, however, foresee an entire month's worth of clickbait speculation linking us with Arsenal, Chelsea and Utd, backed up by zero substance. It's gonna be a long month.
Agreed, but I think he'll only go, if we have a planned target replacement signed.The model is to not stop a player moving on for the right price, we have to honour that to bring in new talent and satisfy agents future pathways. If we hinder anyone, our trust is broken and the flow of talent ceases. It is an extension of the prisoner dilemma, simple game theory, no such thing as a right decision, just weigh up the odds and play the best hand.
The fact IT has a new agent would indicate a move to be the most probable outcome as they (the agent) will want to maximise their own income (through association with the player).
We need to maximise our outcome too
I'm sure we have a better replacement lined up?Can't afford to let him go in January IMO
His replacement (KS) was signed and is currently injured. Its a brave roll of the dice, is it possible to sign a short term winner and not break the bank, or ride the storm till there are better winds.Agreed, but I think he'll only go, if we have a planned target replacement signed.
Are you sure or not? Your words say you’re sure but your question mark says you’re not. Which is it? You’ve cleverly summed up the situation perfectly! [hamsterwheelemoji]I'm sure we have a better replacement lined up?
Can't see him going in Jan .
I think they still want to keep Nketiah ,if they want to get rid , why would we want a player that cant score for them .Right now, without stating the obvious...We really need Toney. I cannot see any obvious replacements that we can sign in January that I'd be confident could help keep us safely up.
If Arsenal offered cash plus Nketiah for example, I'm not sure I would be 100% happy with that as I don't think we'd be looking to spend 35 million on Nketiah otherwise.
why do we have a new thread?
I'm with Bigbee.Because it is Jan transfer window speculation not his player thread
Subject to a gargantuan offer being made, which I don't anticipate in January, I think on this occasion our model will suggest we retain him. Our odds of relegation have increased considerably in the last few weeks and this will have a significant impact on our willingness to sell.The model is to not stop a player moving on for the right price, we have to honour that to bring in new talent and satisfy agents future pathways. If we hinder anyone, our trust is broken and the flow of talent ceases. It is an extension of the prisoner dilemma, simple game theory, no such thing as a right decision, just weigh up the odds and play the best hand.
The fact IT has a new agent would indicate a move to be the most probable outcome as they (the agent) will want to maximise their own income (through association with the player).
We need to maximise our outcome too
I think they still want to keep Nketiah ,if they want to get rid , why would we want a player that cant score for them .
Why someone like Ivan?Just so we can clarify things and prevent this pointless speculation, there is absolutely no chance someone like Ivan will feel obliged to sign a contract with the club out of loyalty, especially as he got himself a new agent a few months ago
B all the way. Premiership safety is paramount plus if IT starts knocking in the goals, your fears of a drop in value will be unfounded.Do we
a) get the highest value possible and sell in Jan, reinvest and and hope it pays off
b) take a significant drop in value in the summer (I think?) and count on him to score the goals to keep us safe.
Goals don't necessarily equal value. I suspect his value will drop, as his contract will be 6 months shorter than it is now.B all the way. Premiership safety is paramount plus if IT starts knocking in the goals, your fears of a drop in value will be unfounded.
Idont understand the questionWhy someone like Ivan?
Yeah there is that. Didn't think about his contract being 6 months shorter. Nevertheless a few man of the match performances plus the goals should still make him a very attractive proposition !!Goals don't necessarily equal value. I suspect his value will drop, as his contract will be 6 months shorter than it is now.
Too late. Hull City have snapped up Billy Sharp!??His replacement (KS) was signed and is currently injured. Its a brave roll of the dice, is it possible to sign a short term winner and not break the bank, or ride the storm till there are better winds.
Is a short term, in our pay grade, goal scoring machine even out there?
Not a difficult one, How do you define "Someone" like Ivan?Idont understand the question
Probably need to ask Adele.Not a difficult one, How do you define "Someone" like Ivan?
I assume he means someone who, on the pitch gives his absolute all for the team and club and is a leader and star performer, however, off the pitch (social media and various interviews) has implied or ‘come across’ as someone who’s primary interest is his own ambitions (not commenting on whether that’s right or wrong) and definitely doesn’t feel he ‘owes’ the club, most of what he says indicates more that we ‘owed’ him for getting us up and firing us to a top half finish.Not a difficult one, How do you define "Someone" like Ivan?
If they don't know the details of IT's contract by now then they've been talking to the wrong people for yearsI treat the article with a huge dollop of skepticism but FYI: New Brentford contract likely for Ivan Toney, with Arsenal and Chelsea waiting for release clause confirmation
If he did sign a new deal, for a few years or more, with a release clause of £80m as suggested, I'd say fair play to him and that's a pretty reasonable way to say thanks to us in the grand scheme of things.
Not sure I follow. Are you suggesting the existing one has a release clause like that or there's been one on the table for ages with a clause like that which hasn't been signed? (or something else)If they don't know the details of IT's contract by now then they've been talking to the wrong people for years
Either or. If Clubs buying don't know whether one exists or not then they are clearly uninterested.Not sure I follow. Are you suggesting the existing one has a release clause like that or there's been one on the table for ages with a clause like that which hasn't been signed? (or something else)
Think I understand you now.Either or. If Clubs buying don't know whether one exists or not then they are clearly uninterested.