No_sting_Bee
Active member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 4,433
- Reaction score
- 1
Josh Dasilva
The rest time during International breaks use to be an advantage now few will get it!
A fascinating appointment. Clearly rated by Arsenal and put forward by Wenger that this could be his break through season. I wonder what made him reject a contract at Arsenal then and become unemployed whilst he found another club? can't be the money as I would guess he could have earned more by staying there, maybe got bad vibes from Emery...or maybe our reputation is even bigger than we think amongst up and coming youngsters.
Is he injured at present or just a case of getting him match fit?
A couple of weeks to get him upto speed with fitness, style of play etc I believe. Not injured.
.............good observation..............He needs time to adapt to a passing game instead of long ball at the Arse
does this add credence to the rumours about Nico going to China?
does this add credence to the rumours about Nico going to China?
I imagine he's been brought in to replace Lewis who is in the last year of his contract.
Every Macleod has Dasilva lining.
I can't see there's a connection, except they're both ex-Arsenal.
I'd say there's currently, without Dasilva and Woods: 2 box-to-box (Macleod and Yennaris); 1 dual-purpose B2B/DHM (Mokotjo); 1 DHM (McEachran); 2 playmakers (Sawyers and Marcondes). Given that 2 of those are at present in the last year of their contracts, a young player who seems to be B2B/DHM is not too many.Both box-to-box midfielders in a squad with a lot/too many midfielders to rotate in the central midfield three.
Do we think he might be involved in the Cheltenham match or is it too early?
Not a good introduction , brentfords annual getting knocked out of the cup by lower league opposition game.
I don't see why not, would be a good chance for him to get some minutes in and see what he's about
Quarter finals at least this year. You heard it here first.
Do we think he might be involved in the Cheltenham match or is it too early?
yep,ask again later
Do we think he might be involved in then Cheltenham match or is it still too early?
Hoping this kid can step up quickly as we clearly need better options in midfield, especially in the box to box/DM roles.
After Rovrum, Stoke and Sheff Wednesday most were waxing lyrical about our midfield. One sh1te team performance against Blackburn and suddenly our midfield is not good enough and needs better options....
I’m just glad we’ve got the points on the board now as we will need them to stay up end of the season based on some experts today.
Seriously massive overreaction to a sh1te performance. If we turn that kind of performance in for the next 4 or 5 games then fair enough, but it sounded like one of those days when we didn't get going and were quite frankly rubbish but I don't believe today will define our season.
After Rovrum, Stoke and Sheff Wednesday most were waxing lyrical about our midfield. One sh1te team performance against Blackburn and suddenly our midfield is not good enough and needs better options....
You always need better options. We can't rely on Josh, Macleod and Sawyers to play to the same level every game. The Villa game showed that and the rotation today showed that perhaps we need a bit more quality when we change things up. Losing Marcondes is a bit of a blow as I'd imagine he'd have come in to give Sawyers a rest,
Seriously massive overreaction to a sh1te performance. If we turn that kind of performance in for the next 4 or 5 games then fair enough, but it sounded like one of those days when we didn't get going and were quite frankly rubbish but I don't believe today will define our season.
Wrong midfield selection in light of having forss on his debut. Should Not have dropped both McE and MacLeod
Seriously massive overreaction to a sh1te performance. .
I'd say there's currently, without Dasilva and Woods: 2 box-to-box (Macleod and Yennaris); 1 dual-purpose B2B/DHM (Mokotjo); 1 DHM (McEachran); 2 playmakers (Sawyers and Marcondes). Given that 2 of those are at present in the last year of their contracts, a young player who seems to be B2B/DHM is not too many.
By the way it wasn’t a reaction to yesterday in particular though it did highlight an area where we are potentially weaker now Woods has left. I’ve been saying for a while that Woods and Sawyers were top quality but whilst we had numbers in midfield perhaps the same level of quality isn’t there in depth. Woods leaving leaves us with...
Josh - Has had a v good start but still questions linger as to whether he can play a lot of games in a short spell and over his long term fitness
Mokotjo- had been looking good in a more advanced role but now looking to be DM backup? Not sure that’s his best position?
Macleod - couple of great games and couple of invisible ones. Game time probably needs to be managed given his lack of appearances over last couple of years. Rumoured not to have signed contract on offer.
Sawyers - our best midfielder and currently main creative outlet. Can’t play every game though so we need to find someone who can rotate with him. Marcondes was looking likely but unfortunately injured at the moment
Yennaris - had dropped right out of favour last season but back in as a starter. Great off the bench but not sure he’s got the technique to be a regular starter in a promotion chasing side
Marcondes - was looking good in pre-season. Hopefully back soon to provide a bit more of the creative spark/attacking threat.
Judge - last season was training to be a no.8 but thus far struggling to get his touch back and looks unlikely we’ll trust him much in the centre in the short term at least.
Da Silva - high hopes for him as he looks strong and quick with good technique and an eye for a pass and goal but hasn’t really played any competitive football in his career so far.
That’s just the way I see it and this is bearing in mind our ambitions for this season, ie a step up from last year. Don’t get me wrong I think we have enough at the mo to be more than comfortable and prob get another top 10 place but if we want to make that step up into play offs or beyond I think we need better quality in depth. As I said earlier hopefully Da Silva can provide that and Marcondes too when he’s eventually fit but I wonder whether we are looking at bringing another body in in that area now woods has finally gone.
By the way it wasn’t a reaction to yesterday in particular though it did highlight an area where we are potentially weaker now Woods has left. I’ve been saying for a while that Woods and Sawyers were top quality but whilst we had numbers in midfield perhaps the same level of quality isn’t there in depth. Woods leaving leaves us with...
Josh - Has had a v good start but still questions linger as to whether he can play a lot of games in a short spell and over his long term fitness
Mokotjo- had been looking good in a more advanced role but now looking to be DM backup? Not sure that’s his best position?
Macleod - couple of great games and couple of invisible ones. Game time probably needs to be managed given his lack of appearances over last couple of years. Rumoured not to have signed contract on offer.
Sawyers - our best midfielder and currently main creative outlet. Can’t play every game though so we need to find someone who can rotate with him. Marcondes was looking likely but unfortunately injured at the moment
Yennaris - had dropped right out of favour last season but back in as a starter. Great off the bench but not sure he’s got the technique to be a regular starter in a promotion chasing side
Marcondes - was looking good in pre-season. Hopefully back soon to provide a bit more of the creative spark/attacking threat.
Judge - last season was training to be a no.8 but thus far struggling to get his touch back and looks unlikely we’ll trust him much in the centre in the short term at least.
Da Silva - high hopes for him as he looks strong and quick with good technique and an eye for a pass and goal but hasn’t really played any competitive football in his career so far.
That’s just the way I see it and this is bearing in mind our ambitions for this season, ie a step up from last year. Don’t get me wrong I think we have enough at the mo to be more than comfortable and prob get another top 10 place but if we want to make that step up into play offs or beyond I think we need better quality in depth. As I said earlier hopefully Da Silva can provide that and Marcondes too when he’s eventually fit but I wonder whether we are looking at bringing another body in in that area now woods has finally gone.
Think you're being harsh on McE.
He got bypassed at Villa as he struggles when people get a run on him for pace.......exactly the same as Sawyers and MacLeod and why we struggled as a team (combined with people like Canos needing to help out more defensively). Hence we looked better when subs were made. All three of them have that weakness and Sawyers is no different.
Sawyers, was also present at Blackburn, yet hardly pulling up trees by all accounts, and in fact you could argue it's McE we missed, to keep things moving fast and open teams up.
I agree about Kamo as I've said elsewhere - I think he's looked quite decent in attacking situations - but has looked less assured defensively.
I think we benefit from the creativity of having both McE and Sawyers and they're the sort of player that can actually break a press and take lots of opposition players out of the game quickly (especially McE).
However it's horses for courses, and if we come up against an opposition midfield that's althetic, pacey, and prepared to move the ball at speed, then we have to acknowledge that we'll need at least one, if not two, of the midfield three to be quicker. So perhaps Kamo with McE and Sawyers, and if that's not fast enough we swap out McE or Sawyers for someone faster. We also need to ensure the wingers tuck in without the ball (Canos is particularly bad for giving no cover and it's not always the midfield's fault for being overrun).
I think "pace" in the midfield positions is lower down the list of physical attributes than most of the others but mobility is vital, particularly with stamina, which is slightly different; of course, pace is always handy. Most of our midfielders have decent mobility, if not spectacular; McEachran does not have too much stamina, though, and Macleod similarly, but that may be due to the lack of a long run of games. Woods primary attribute was stamina but he was not that mobile, so pace is hardly a pre-requisite....I agree re against more athletic teams etc, the issue is how do we get that extra pace into midfield without losing the ability to play the way we can at our best or without sacrificing creativity? This Arsenal kid looks like he might tick those boxes but no idea how near or far from being first team ready he might be..
I think "pace" in the midfield positions is lower down the list of physical attributes than most of the others but mobility is vital, particularly with stamina, which is slightly different; of course, pace is always handy. Most of our midfielders have decent mobility, if not spectacular; McEachran does not have too much stamina, though, and Macleod similarly, but that may be due to the lack of a long run of games. Woods primary attribute was stamina but he was not that mobile, so pace is hardly a pre-requisite.
Woods primary attribute was stamina but he was not that mobile, so pace is hardly a pre-requisite.
Compared to and In relation to our other midfielders, he never seemed that mobile to me. He always seemed to struggle getting from side to side, for example, when play switched. Certainly better in possession than out of it.I am surprised you think that Woodsy was not that mobile.
Seriously massive overreaction to a sh1te performance. If we turn that kind of performance in for the next 4 or 5 games then fair enough, but it sounded like one of those days when we didn't get going and were quite frankly rubbish but I don't believe today will define our season.
I think "pace" in the midfield positions is lower down the list of physical attributes than most of the others but mobility is vital, particularly with stamina, which is slightly different; of course, pace is always handy. Most of our midfielders have decent mobility, if not spectacular; McEachran does not have too much stamina, though, and Macleod similarly, but that may be due to the lack of a long run of games. Woods primary attribute was stamina but he was not that mobile, so pace is hardly a pre-requisite.
We were absolutely right to drop MacLeod but think in hindsight Josh Mc might have started. In defence of DS he rarely plays 90 minutes so 2 games in 4 days might have been seen as a bridge too far.
OK, and I hope that Josh_Da, with his years of education at Arsenal, will have all that, plus a bit of pace.Pace is probably the wrong word, I’m talking more about speed of thought, reactions, the ability to move the ball quickly and move into space. That little burst of acceleration to take you away from a player. One touch passing rather than having to take a touch to control.
Shame he couldn't make the bench today. Would have been good to get a glimpse!