mark peters now

[flowerpower bee]

with rowan vine forced to miss the qpr game through suspension
this offers wally an ideal opportunity to offer mark peters his first start
alongside either antoine-curier or kevin o'connor

peters is under contract for next season
and has a key role to play

we have to discover if he's up to it

 

[sonko31]

Why not give Efan "the chief" Ekoku a run out wih super marky peters the infamouse and invalueble asset we have in treble E Efan Ekoku's Experiance could be just what an already impressive in the bits he's played young player, he is our future hero. YOU READ IT HERE FIRST!!!

 

[hanwell bee]

he is our future hero. YOU READ IT HERE FIRST!!!

He is 35

Also Peters is still suspended I believe so can't play on Sat

Kev & Curier is the only option we have

 

[we are the bees]

well wot was the point in signing efan ekoku?? if he aint going to play?

 

[Alex]

well wot was the point in signing efan ekoku?? if he aint going to play?

He was just signed as cover as we couldn't sign who we wanted to.

 

[JBN]

By my calculations, Peters should be available for the QPR game.

He should have been starting games back in January and his red card should have been appealed. OK it was down to money but if the decission was wrong, it was wrong.

Bad refs have cost us dearly this season.

 

[homerbees]

well wot was the point in signing efan ekoku?? if he aint going to play?

yeah welcome hope to see many posts from you!lol

 

[JTofBFC]

well wot was the point in signing efan ekoku?? if he aint going to play?

Yes, an interesting question. I suspect it was just to demonstrate to the fans that we had actually signed somebody at all, even though he was training with us for fitness already and was highly unlikely to be match fit this season. I assume we aren't actually paying him any wages, at least I hope not.

 

[PAZ]

Yes, an interesting question. I suspect it was just to demonstrate to the fans that we had actually signed somebody at all, even though he was training with us for fitness already and was highly unlikely to be match fit this season. I assume we aren't actually paying him any wages, at least I hope not.

Agreed. I assume it's just a "signing" so that we can give him a squad number. I would be survived if we're giving him more than 2p a week. Can anyone confirm?

 

[KcBee]

Although i agree that Peters is due a start, iam not sure that a home derby against our main rivals is the best game to make your first start. Particuarly with his disicplinary record! Iam positive he will be on the bench. How long have we got Antoine-Curier for then?

 

[hanwell bee]

Although i agree that Peters is due a start, iam not sure that a home derby against our main rivals is the best game to make your first start. Particuarly with his disicplinary record! Iam positive he will be on the bench. How long have we got Antoine-Curier for then?

We've got AC til the end of the season.
I would mind seeing Peters start, but if not at least get a good 30 mins to get into the game. He always looks promising but doesn't normally get enough time to really get into it

 

[Top Cat]

I can see Wally putting Hunty up front again.....nah!

Kev and Tony Curry. Sorted!

Peters on the bench (or in front of it at the Magistrates Court if he keeps chinning people......)

 

[-superbees2k3-]

lol

 

[West Ealing Bee]

I think O'Connor will start up front agianst QPR, but it very much depends on where he plays this Saturday.

Fullarton and O'Connor will both come back into the team, Fullarton probably instead of Smith but where does O'Connor go.
Personally I would play him with Vine, and then bring Peters in against QPR and Chesterfield, with Curier as cover for the 2 games in three days.

 

[Holysmit]

Fullarton and O'Connor will both come back into the team, Fullarton probably instead of Smith but where does O'Connor go.
Personally I would play him with Vine, and then bring Peters in against QPR and Chesterfield, with Curier as cover for the 2 games in three days.

If Peters and O'Connor are both going to be here next season (touch wood) would it not be better to play Peters and O'Connor together for the rest of the season to get used to each other. Yes I know their are hundreds of players out there avaialble we'll probably sign a new striker etc but the fact remains we can't gurantee this as A) how do we know we sign anyone better then we currently have B) how do we know we'll find a striker who fits in with Wally's style of play C) Our luck with strikers this year has been sh*t whats to say this doesn't continue?

Also as people have pointed out that they want to play a full strength team against QPR well as we are missing Vine for that game would it not be an idea to give them a game to get to gel although not much time its better then no games at all.

 

[JBN]

Couldn't agree more.

It is just a shame that our Wally didn't do this three months ago.

We should be looking to build for next season. Those that are likely to play are part should be on the pitch now getting some games under their belts and geling as team, rather than relying on a few preseason frendlies against Crawley, Richmond, Sutton etc etc.

 

[West Ealing Bee]

If Peters and O'Connor are both going to be here next season (touch wood) would it not be better to play Peters and O'Connor together for the rest of the season to get used to each other.

Peters is suspended tomorrow, I would be surprised and slightly annoyed if he didn't play a part against QPR.

 

[BoroBee]

I would be surprised and slightly annoyed

ohhhhh.... that'll make Wally change his tactics lol
West Ealing Bee will be slightly annoyed and BoroBee will be a bit miffed if Wally doesn't listen to advice!