Les Beeavinu
Administrator
Middlesex CCC 2023
With Lancs piling on the runs, looks like a draw is inevitable at Canterbury. All in Middx hands now.
My back of a fag packet maths tells me Middlesex will stay up by 1 point in the event of a tie.Do Middlesex stay up if the match is tied?
Commentary reckons no, only the side batting second gets extra points for a tie apparentlyDo Middlesex stay up if the match is tied?
Sorry, just to clarify this. If the scores are level and Notts have wickets left but run out of overs then Middlesex are down. If the scores are level and Middlesex bowl Notts out then they stay upCommentary reckons no, only the side batting second gets extra points for a tie apparently
3 batting, 3 bowling IIRCHow many 1st innings bonus points did Middx get?
Yes, one is a draw, the other is a tie.Sorry, just to clarify this. If the scores are level and Notts have wickets left but run out of overs then Middlesex are down. If the scores are level and Middlesex bowl Notts out then they stay up
But in both scenarios Notts would get 8 points. Anyway Middlesex relegated, Kent safeYes, one is a draw, the other is a tie.
Sadly true.Close but not happening , Like in most sports teams who are relegated only have themselves to blame I’m afraid .
Will play two T20 Blast games at Chelmsford in 2024.
Shocking decision.
It's probably more about temporary seating? (edit - as you say in your secund line).Are they saying its too expensive to build a marquee at an out ground then
Temporary seating ?
It's probably more about temporary seating? (edit - as you say in your secund line).
Too expensive to build and use three times but fine to build and use once, it seems.
Access to Lord's is increasingly restricted by ever more international cricket, MCC matches and The Hundred (not my cup of tea btw). The situation is far from ideal and although MCCC do try and make the membership attractive with discounts, free guest passes, etc. as @GP200 indicates, the benefits of membership are severely diluted while we don't have our own home ground (or more access to Lord's).I assume Lords is till restricted by the local residents with a maximum number of days the lights can be used in one summer ??
Maybe time to leave Lord's and build a base at one of the out grounds, Uxbridge say.Access to Lord's is increasingly restricted by ever more international cricket, MCC matches and The Hundred (not my cup of tea btw). The situation is far from ideal and although MCCC do try and make the membership attractive with discounts, free guest passes, etc. as @GP200 indicates, the benefits of membership are severely diluted while we don't have our own home ground (or more access to Lord's).
Talking about kicking a man when they are down.Such a shame how these second class counties are struggling so much these days......
If Uxbridge is even smaller they probably think it will also not make money / not make enough money compared to this idea, and not serve the interests of members. They can argue that a stadium in Essex with thousands of seats is looking out for lots of members who can all attend the fixture even if it is in the wrong place.Sounds like Radlett are less receptive to Middlesex's whims than previously.
One marquee, two smaller gazeboes, and 400 fold up seats and Uxbridge would be equipped but obviously out of favour
I think it's also supposedly about not upsetting the local residents especially with busy evening games and all that noise and music.Access to Lord's is increasingly restricted by ever more international cricket, MCC matches and The Hundred (not my cup of tea btw). The situation is far from ideal and although MCCC do try and make the membership attractive with discounts, free guest passes, etc. as @GP200 indicates, the benefits of membership are severely diluted while we don't have our own home ground (or more access to Lord's).
If Uxbridge is even smaller they probably think it will also not make money / not make enough money compared to this idea, and not serve the interests of members. They can argue that a stadium in Essex with thousands of seats is looking out for lots of members who can all attend the fixture even if it is in the wrong place.
What happened to playing in Southgate? Sky used to televise games there before Lord's had floodlights. Seems to have been out of favour for a decade now.
I think it's also supposedly about not upsetting the local residents especially with busy evening games and all that noise and music.
What annoys me about this is the double standards over the number of games.
When T20 Cup / T20 Blast was the biggest show in domestic cricket each summer, the MCC only allowed 4 Middlesex games at Lord's. Even home quarter finals have had to be played elsewhere.
Now the Hundred is around they can play another 4 London Spirit games there, and the final, and Middlesex are still restricted to four games.
Was it really impossible to play more than 4 games there in the first place, given that there are now nine games there across both competitions?
I was a Middlesex member in 2021 and 2022 (got a freebie guest membership in 2021 as my friend was a member through the Covid season) and I recall them praising Radlett for handling Covid games well, whilst in the same breath saying yes Radlett was going to be the main/ only T20 out ground for the foreseeable future.Uxbridge is bigger than Radlett and Southgate in terms of space for spectators. Middlesex CCC have shown little commitment to them and most of their
out grounds in recent years, little continuity until Radlett (Hertfordshire) was nominated as Middx's home away from Lords, and maybe they have now reached saturation point. Richmond (Surrey) and Merchant Taylors (right on the borderline with Hertfordshire) have been recently involved
but are now being seen as too costly to set up for the occasional T20 match. Add in Middx CCC using the Oval for T20 matches and now Chelmsford, and perhaps a name change to Middlesex Wanderers maybe more appropriate for the 2024 season. It is unlikely to do much for Middx finances however !