What is positive about Chairman Noades message?
Short term I will join the applause for Chairman Noades in not accepting offers for two of our “star players”. He appears to have the smell of promotion and the benefits associated with it clearly in his nostrils. But why no mention regarding the remainder of his message? It is full of doom and gloom, surely?
Firstly, before some people erroneously accuse me of posting rubbish, I must again reinforce my position is very similar to that of Chairman Noades. IMO, I do not consider that GP offer a sustainable long future for BFC. We must move in order to generate sufficient additional revenues to reduce, or indeed reverse, our present operating losses. I fully support Chairman Noades 1005 on this and always have, regardless of what either he or some of you may have mistakenly thought. However, what I do not agree with are the methods and procedures that are being suggested we need to adopt to achieve this either long or short term. Chairman Noades appears to have very narrow view of how things may be achieved as well as a shallow knowledge of many procedures etc associated with both Local Government and development.
For instance in his latest message he talks about land values. The values indicated by the Inland Revenue are fact, not speculation. They are averages not site specific. Chairman Noades talks about the price of flats presently being sold in Brentford, but conveniently forgets to mention that all of the developments I would suspect he refers to are in much superior locations to GP and will therefore attract a premium (Brentford Dock, River Views, looking across to Kew Gardens etc.) I'm afraid that GP cannot offer such advantages.
He uses the term EEC when referring to Bosman. Well the term EEC (European Economic Community) has not been in use for many years. It has been called the EU (European Union) for approx 10 years. This may seem like nit picking but I think demonstrates that Chairman Noades is perhaps not as informed on subjects as he would like some people to think! Indeed, the Bosman implications were clearly evident when Chairman Noades arrived in 1998, so why does he keep using it as an excuse? OK, it has not helped but he must surely, if he is as cute as he wants us to believe, taken that in to account when drawing up his business plan when he arrived! If he did not then I consider that it probably demonstrates that he is perhaps not the dynamic businessman he would have us believe?
OK, the ITV money may well be disappearing down the drain and £180k may not be forthcoming in 2002- 2003 season. However, does Chairman Noades really believe that there will be no income from TV rights for Nationwide Games beyond this season? It may not be £180k per year for us, but there will surely be some income? Doom and gloom!!!
Corporate Sponsorship is said to be practically non-existent because of the lack of facilities. Why is that? You do not have to have boxes. Be innovative and use what we have got to get corporate sponsorship in. What do we pay the marketing team for? Are they so sterile that they cannot use their initiative to attract some big corporate names to the support the club in some shape or form? After all, we are 6 or so miles form Heathrow, the Great West Road area has some of the biggest companies in the country less than a mile away and we cannot get one or more of the companies from these areas interested in bringing some money to GP. Well, I suggest that you get your marketing team to watch Rogue Traders and similar consumer programmes on TV Chairman Noades. Then go and poach the sales people featured. They will sell the club for you and bring in some revenue. May not be strictly kosher, but then who cares?
If you really want some boxes at GP why not take out the rear section of New Road seats as a temporary measure and put in some temporary boxes? It's worth a try for a season or so surely? Or perhaps this would not assist in your true objectives?
There is a distinct lack of innovation and inspiration at GP. It seems as if all you are interested in is getting your guarantee money back. If that is the case why not just say so?
Yes, not selling any of our players has been a godsend. But the rest of his message is, as usual, all doom and gloom. Has anyone actually ever seen any positive moves from Chairman Noades, apart from the we must sell GP to survive theory that he constantly peddles? Yes we must sell and relocate to something more modern that generates higher revenues. But why does it appear as if the short term appears to be completely ignored unless it involves shipping the Bees to some far-flung ground that is a long way from west Middlesex?
Chairman Noades, we are not all fools so please stop treating us as such. You may have fooled some with bit of gloss, a pleasant gloss I admit, but how long will that shine last. Not too long I suggest!!
[ 30 March 2002: Message edited by: Baz Bee ]
[ 31 March 2002: Message edited by: Baz Bee ]