No! Apart from owt else I like his honesty in dealing with the media. No one expected success.
No. Anyone who says yes should name a replacement.
No. Anyone who says yes should name a replacement.
Anyone......redknapp, pardew, Neville, Mancini ...Roy's failed he should be gone
No. Anyone who says yes should name a replacement.
I think if you accept failure you encourage a culture that says failure is ok and then you slip further behind your competitors.
Football is a business and in business if your Executive Team do not reach their targets the shareholders would demand one or all to be replaced.
We are the shareholders in english football and I don`t accept the 2014 World Cup shambles as progress or a stepping stone in a 6yr strategy to deliver success. If we are building for the future why play Lampard and Milner against Costa Rica Roy?
Friendlies provide opportunities to build for the future. It was only fitting to give Lampard the send-off that he deserves
No.
Who is there to replace him with?
Anyone......redknapp, pardew, Neville, Mancini ...Roy's failed he should be gone
Roy to stay. The end results have been poor in this tournament but I can see the early stages of a style of play with a youthful squad that will benefit from the continuity of Roy staying at the helm. If this current crop can develop over the next 2 years and we reach a minimum of the semi finals of the Euros in 2016 then I would be happy with that.
We need to be involved in a tournament next summer if possible,something like the confederation cup, as the more our players play in tournament situations the better. If there is nothing scheduled then the FA should try to invite 7 top nations to England in the summer of 2015 and have an 8 team tournament, 2 groups of 4. Good tournament experience and it willhelp pay for Wembley!
Sorry a minimum of the semi finals in 2016???????????? The current FA top brass are happy for Roy to deliver 1 point and finishing bottom. I cannot see a dramatic improvement after 50 years of failure. Also you can guarantee that Spain will be a force again and France are a force on the up and at home.
Sorry a minimum of the semi finals in 2016???????????? The current FA top brass are happy for Roy to deliver 1 point and finishing bottom. I cannot see a dramatic improvement after 50 years of failure. Also you can guarantee that Spain will be a force again and France are a force on the up and at home.
Yes woy out..harry in asap.
No. Anyone who says yes should name a replacement.
Why?
There are people paid millions of pounds a year to make that decision, why should I do their job for them?
Genuinely believe we wouldn't have qualified with Redknapp in charge.
There are people paid millions of pounds a year to decide whether Roy stays or goes. Why should you do their job for them?
If you don't think he's up to the job, who do you think can do better? Quite simple really.
Hodgson should go along with Lewington and allow a younger, more dynamic coach to come in. Martinez has been mentioned in this thread - Brendan Rodgers is another name to throw into the mix. No doubt we have some decent youngsters coming through but, apart from the first half v Italy, we were totally devoid of ideas. The so called golden generation of Beckham, Owen, Lampard & Gerrard etc in their prime were wasted and the present crop will be to unless there is change
Do you believe that Hodgson is the best man for the job and that he's good value for a four year contract totalling £14,000,000??
Quite simple really.
I think Roy is the right man to develop the younger players.
There are people paid millions of pounds a year to decide whether Roy stays or goes. Why should you do their job for them?
If you don't think he's up to the job, who do you think can do better? Quite simple really.
I named one in my earlier post, read it again. Quite simple Really.
I see other countries making the best of what they have, I don't see that with Roy. If he did get it right then we would only get to the quarters with the players available but we should be making it out of a group and getting more than a point. if you think he is the only possible option then it is even simpler for you, don't even bother to think about it.
I will name all the managers who have got their teams into the next round...there you go.
Why?
I think, although we went out at an earlier stage, England produced better performances. As someone above said; if Sturridge had done better with the chances set up for him we'd be facing Greece in the last 16. 2010 was awful. I think this was an improvement and it will get better. We've got players to come back from injuries. It should also be pointed out that most teams have lost the game after playing in Manaus. We had bits of misfortune in every game.
We got 5 points in the last world cup and one in this one, how can we have been better. i think everyone is getting carried away with how good our group was. Italy have managed 1 win in 12, and that was against us. To consider a 2.1 defeat to a team who have not managed a win in a year to be a decent performance is I am afraid a very poor show. Tactically we didn't taken the basic step of marking their only decent player and he destroyed us, the other 11 teams they have played all managed it.
To be fair we missed chances but it is not as if we were creating stacks of them.
roy for now but mouriniho eventually.....hed love the job.....and i think it would change things massively for the better