SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Banana

Admin
Joined
7 Apr 2000
Messages
120,279
Reaction score
84,698
Location
London

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

At 79:59 on the clock, this player collects the ball from the ball boy. Not even lined-up to take the throw-in yet

At 80:07 England's best referee decided to book this time-waster for wasting a whole EIGHT SECONDS taking a throw-in.

No doubt these 8 seconds contributed to the 8 minutes added on time

1701550924177.jpeg1701550954795.jpeg
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

I’d like that one explained. Hope the Liebfraumilch is good.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

I should like to point out that ‘Salm’ is the Maltese word for a psalm.

It’s also a municipality in Germany’s Rhineland-Palatinate.

You ok, hun?
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

..............who is SALM....????............
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

The ref confused Norgaard with the Jensen routine of not taking a short throw initially and then going for the long throw. The ref premeditated the time wasting. The discrepancy between 1st and 2nd half added time highlights the need to take timekeeping away from the ref.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

To be fair the ref had hurried Norgaard up on the two throw ins that had been taken on the other side of the pitch a few minutes earlier.
He took 9 seconds on the first one
and 15 on the second one

So ref booked him in 8 seconds for the 3rd one.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Not that it warrants a yellow but Norgaard produced some of the most blatant foul throws with feet off the floor that I have ever seen today.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Not that it warrants a yellow but Norgaard produced some of the most blatant foul throws with feet off the floor that I have ever seen today.
I agree. I was surprised he was elected to take the throws up their end of the pitch. His long throws weren’t great. Pinnock normally does it when Jensen is off.

Lastly, we do use the short/long throw tactic as a way to run the clock down, it might make sense to have someone who isn’t on 4 cards to do it in the last 15 when the ref is looking for someone to book.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

He took ages for two throws just before this and deserved the booking as someone has said. Also as said, a couple of his throws were blatantly foul throws, comically so! ?
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

He took ages for two throws just before this and deserved the booking as someone has said. Also as said, a couple of his throws were blatantly foul throws, comically so! ?
What is "ages" please?

One was 9 seconds, and the other 15. He didn't get booked for them, but he got booked for one after 7 seconds
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

He took ages for two throws just before this
He took a lot less time on all of his throws than Jensen ever does and Matty's never been booked for it (perhaps surprisingly) so there needs to be more consistency among refs on this since if 13 other refs have considered Jensen's throws not to be worthy of a yellow card, why does Taylor deem the less amount of time taken by Nogaard to be enough to constitute a bookable offence?
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

15 seconds is ‘ages’ to take a throw in once you have the ball.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

He didn't get booked for that. So ref accepted 15 second is ok.

Refs use a cumulative process for such things, like when they add up minor fouls and book on the third or fourth… you’ll see them telling players after they don’t book them for the second or third foul (totting up). Same goes for keepers and goal kicks (and in this case throw ins). All subjective but seemed a reasonable booking to me.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Refs use a cumulative process for such things, like when they add up minor fouls and book on the third or fourth… you’ll see them telling players after they don’t book them for the second or third foul (totting up). Same goes for keepers and goal kicks (and in this case throw ins). All subjective but seemed a reasonable booking to me.
Congratulations.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Not that it warrants a yellow but Norgaard produced some of the most blatant foul throws with feet off the floor that I have ever seen today.
One was so bad, the whole of the Northwest corner where he took it from burst out laughing!!!!
Assistant ref seemed happy with it though!!!
???
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

? The context of the game is also important! As I say, subjective… don’t waste your Saturday evening on this.
What about your Wednesday evening at Brighton....??....
CN won't be "wasting" his there now.....
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Moral : if you take too long taking throw ins, you'll eventually get booked. If you don't want a booking, then get on with it.

Complaining for complainings sake.

Here endeth the lesson.
Consistency is important here. The referee had allowed a number of throw ins and goal kicks (including by the Luton keeper after he had been cautioned) to take more than 10 seconds without taking any action.

CN would reasonably have thought he wasn’t at risk of being cautioned based on what had happened in the first 80 mins of the match.

Also, TF said that CNs caution was ‘absolutely the wrong decision’
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

I'm getting on a bit, but would defo back myself to take a throw on within say 10 secs, so prob defo yellow in my old school book.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

I'm getting on a bit, but would defo back myself to take a throw on within say 10 secs, so prob defo yellow in my old school book.
Except it took 7 seconds to be booked
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Last weekend I was watching a couple of Brentford games from the 60s and 70s and I was surprised how quickly throw ins were taken and all seemed to be taken from the exact spot where the ball went out.

I even remember, probably in the 70s, when our full back Alan Hawley advanced a free kick in the Bees' own half about 15 metres forward and even the New Road side were shouting at him for "cheating". He turned to us smiling and put a finger to his lips to shush us and then sheepishly moved the ball back to the original spot. It was a different game in those days with keepers releasing the ball as quickly as possible to catch the opposition defence that may have pushed too far forward.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Can we get a spreadsheet of time taken on throw ins at every Brentford game and any resulting yellow cards? ?
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Can we get a spreadsheet of time taken on throw ins at every Brentford game and any resulting yellow cards? ?
Feel free to create one and share with the rest of us anoraks.
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

It’s almost like Taylor realised he had messed up last week by getting Brighton’s best player suspended for the Brentford match, and was trying desperately to level things up by getting one of our best players suspended too
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

One was so bad, the whole of the Northwest corner where he took it from burst out laughing!!!!
Assistant ref seemed happy with it though!!!
???
This is another area where the authorities need to decide what their priorities are and then demand some consistency from their officials.

For years, refs and linos have turned a blind eye to all but the most ridiculous of foul throws. Now though, some officials are starting to get…. well… officious with it again. Problem is, most aren’t, still.

Yet, if you watch youth football, or women’s, you’ll get bang on consistency and officiousness. So at least you know where you stand.

The moral of the story, I guess, is just to make sure you do it right. Just in case the fella below turns up to ref the fixture.

IMG_0742.jpeg
 

SLAM DUNK TIME WASTING

Have you just noticed! Most players do and no one appears to take any notice, I think linos are looking else where.
I’m at the very back of the North Stand so it’s probably not as apparent to me as those who sit a bit closer to the pitch but CN yesterday looked like Jonathan Edwards mid-flight when taking his throws ?
 
Back
Top Bottom