Smug keeper.

Smug keeper.

I dont believe that should have counted, when the goalie pushed the ball out thats when the game should have stopped
 

Smug keeper.

The rules state that in a shoot out, once the ball loses forward momentum, it is considered a dead ball.

So, if the ball hits the post, bounces back and hits the keeper and goes in the net, does that count as a goal. The ball has lost forward momentum, by hitting the post, and is going backwards.
 

Smug keeper.

jiffy said:
So, if the ball hits the post, bounces back and hits the keeper and goes in the net, does that count as a goal.
Click to expand...

i have a vague memory of this from my World Cup 90 sticker album - but i believe they might've changed the rules now... :confused:
 

Smug keeper.

jiffy said:
The rules state that in a shoot out, once the ball loses forward momentum, it is considered a dead ball.
Click to expand...

If the ball is still moving is it considered a dead ball?

Very funny to see though.
 

Smug keeper.

jiffy said:
http://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/blog...ouldn-t-be-too-quick-to-celebr?urn=sow-268819
Click to expand...

haha, excellent. :cry:

hanworthbee said:
I dont believe that should have counted, when the goalie pushed the ball out thats when the game should have stopped
Click to expand...

jiffy said:
The rules state that in a shoot out, once the ball loses forward momentum, it is considered a dead ball.
Click to expand...

have you just made that law up??? sounds a ridiculous one. :sorted:

Mr Tree said:
i have a vague memory of this from my World Cup 90 sticker album - but i believe they might've changed the rules now... :confused:
Click to expand...


yes i think i remember that, wasnt it Brazils white goalkeeper with the perm the one, Carlos i think?

:cry:
 

Smug keeper.

Yes, if there is any chance that this is not a goal, then the game has changed beyond all recognition!!

Stupid egotistic goalkeeper got his cummuppence!!! :)
 

Smug keeper.

i was thinking that too. In a shoot out once the ball has stopped or at least come back towards you then the kick is over. Regardless of wicked back spins or anything. Though reading some refereeing forums they'd give a goal.
 

Smug keeper.

ladbroke said:
i was thinking that too. In a shoot out once the ball has stopped or at least come back towards you then the kick is over. Regardless of wicked back spins or anything. Though reading some refereeing forums they'd give a goal.
Click to expand...

so what about the scenario I suggested, where the ball hits the post and comes back towards you, hits the keeper and goes in. Is that a goal?

I don't know the honest answer.
 

Smug keeper.

Law 14 (penalty kicks) says:

"When a penalty kick is taken during the normal course of play, or time has
been extended at half-time or full time to allow a penalty kick to be taken or
retaken, a goal is awarded if, before passing between the goalposts and under
the crossbar:
• the ball touches either or both of the goalposts and/or the crossbar and/or
the goalkeeper
The referee decides when a penalty kick has been completed."

My brain hurt a bit reading that, but it seems to cover the situation where the ball hits the woodwork, bounces out, hits the keeper, and rebounds in - ie, the goal counts.

In the bit of the laws about penalty shootouts, it says:

"Unless otherwise stated, the relevant Laws of the Game and International
F.A. Board Decisions apply when kicks from the penalty mark are being
taken."

So - unless there's something somewhere else in the laws that I've missed (which is quite possible) - the referee got this one right. That seems fair to me because, even though the ball had moved forward, it was still the original momentum from the kick that took it over the line.

And, of course, because the keeper deserved it.
 

Smug keeper.

Surely its very simple..its the keepers job to stop the ball going into the net...he didn't.
 

Smug keeper.

It's been removed - NO GOAL. :thetruth: :crazy3:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom