When does a club loan out their first choice keeper?
Tony Warner anyone?
Warner was the keeper who was hours away from joining us for the 1st game. Went somewhere else at the 11th hour.
.............maybe we'll register Burridge as a player....we must be one of the few clubs he hasn't played for!.......
Yeah let him go. let Mousinho stay in goal
:beer: :beer: :beer:Exactly. I'm struggling with the logic of this one. I would hope that another goalie is lined up. Less than two months ago, we weren't certain whether or not Masters was ready for 1st team football. I can't believe we're now going to push him as the only senior keeper on the books.
Same here, trying to understand the reasoning. I dont rate Nelson but think this looks like a very foolish decision at first glance.
1) First question - is Nelson out of contract at the end of this season or does he have another year
2) If we are reduced to loaning a first choice player to a team (also skint) in a division below us just so that they pay his wages and then hopefully take him off our hands on a free at season's end then we are more fuuucked than I thought we were

Why was he watching the game from the tunnel in his Brentford suit?
1) Contract expires June 30 2007.
2) Worry ye not. Signy will no doubt be on here soon telling us how wonderful everything is and we'll all feel a lot, lot better........![]()
strong rumouir at the game today is that nelson has gone to swindon on a season long loan. don't believe that one can recall from such a loan, so need a new keeper for the next game.
Thanks for the info.
This is one where we all get our knickers in a twist until the truth emerges.
Maybe Nelson is still at GP, missed thegame through injury and will be OK to play next week when Masters is suspeended - and it should just be a 1 game ban for a professional foul , not 3 as others have posted.
Beyond that, who knows. My previous questions still stand about LR's motives should the loan story be true.
Ronan;880725 But why would he go to Swindon on loan :(?[/QUOTE said:Cos Leroy told him
My understanding is that the "deal" was on but has not been completed and that the Masters sending off may change things.
thrown toys out after been told he aint playing today, what a disgrace, but qwho is there to come in?
Well for starters Clarke is facing a ban of at least a couple of matches
If he had thrown his toys out and refused to be on the bench, then surely he would have been told to go home and stay at home, wouldn't he? Not appear in his dapper Brentford suit and watch the game

Nelson and Dapper are not words I would use in the same sentence![]()

We heard from posters that had been to the Training Ground that Nelson had an "ankle injury" 15 minutes after being told he wasn't playing today.
If it was a ploy of Nelson's to be "injured" rather than "dropped" it's backfired enormously. He could have been between the sticks today. Reading between the lines I believe that Leroy doesn't believe the injury story; and doesn't want someone that invents injuries when their place is challenged. Leroy has then displayed strong management and let Nelson join his flatmate at Swindon.
This is all speculation of course.
However it seems certain that a deal was agreed with Swindon. Masters's sending off may change that in the short term.
.We heard from posters that had been to the Training Ground that Nelson had an "ankle injury" 15 minutes after being told he wasn't playing today.
If it was a ploy of Nelson's to be "injured" rather than "dropped" it's backfired enormously. He could have been between the sticks today. Reading between the lines I believe that Leroy doesn't believe the injury story; and doesn't want someone that invents injuries when their place is challenged. Leroy has then displayed strong management and let Nelson join his flatmate at Swindon.
This is all speculation of course.
However it seems certain that a deal was agreed with Swindon. Masters's sending off may change that in the short term.