Team vs Oldham

[alexcavell]

I'd go for:


-----------------Lee

Spillane--Osborne--Balkestein--Woodman

Wood--Diagouraga--O'Connor---Weston

---------Grabban--Alexander


Subs: Hamer, Legge, Adams, Saunders, Bean, Hunt, MacDonald/Hudson


I think Lee more than deserves a league start at last, and Forster needs his operation so we can see the best of him sooner rather than later.

 

[shouldbee]

Hamer

Spillane
Osborne
Pim ( captain )
Woodman

Saunders
Diagouraga
KOC
Weston

Grabban
Forster

Well..........Andy said he wants us to keep the ball !!

 

[nick logan]

-------------- Hamer

Spillane Osborne Pim Woodman

Wood Kevin Dave Weston

-------- Grabban Alexander

 

[Newbury Bee 09]

Lee

Spillane
Osborne
Pim
Woodman

Adams
Dave
O'Connor
Weston

Grabbon
Alexander

 

[Ghost]

Lee

Spillane
Osborne
Pim
Woodman

Adams
Dave
O'Connor
Weston

Grabbon
Alexander

That's the cheese

 

[Brentford_till_die]

Hamer.
Spills. Osborne. Pim. Woodman.
Wood. Dave. Kevin. Weston.
Alexander. Grabban.

 

[Brentford_till_die]

Scott wont drop Hamer! Maybe also something in the loan contract if hes fit he plays? otherwise why loan him to get first team to sit on the bench.

 

[Chopper]

Hamer
Spillane Osborne Pim Woodman
Dave
Adams Weston
Saunders
Alexander Grabban

Still think we should play this formation.

 

[Owlsmoor_Bee]

Hamer
Spillane Osborne Pim Woodman
Dave
Adams Weston
Saunders
Alexander Grabban

Still think we should play this formation.

And unfortunately I still think you'd get the fright of your life when Oldham simply barrelled through the middle of us without so much of a whimper from our central midfield. :shrug:

I can see how you'd like the team set up, but I don't see that we have the players to do it I'm afraid.

 

[bonafidebee]

Hamer
Spillane Osborne Pim Woodman
Dave
Adams Weston
Saunders
Alexander Grabban

Still think we should play this formation.

That's Spurs under the Ossie Ardiles regime. Thank god we've got AS in charge.

 

[nick logan]

Hamer
Spillane Osborne Pim Woodman
Dave
Adams Weston
Saunders
Alexander Grabban

Still think we should play this formation.

 

[nick logan]

Scott wont drop Hamer! Maybe also something in the loan contract if hes fit he plays? otherwise why loan him to get first team to sit on the bench.

* counts to ten *

As wants 2 (two) good goalkeepers to fight for place

 

[Brentford_till_die]

yeah but wouldnt Reading want him playing . . aint that the idea

 

[wadbee]

* counts to ten *

As wants 2 (two) good goalkeepers to fight for place

Then once they've fought he gives the jersey to Hamer

 

[Wooburn Bee]

I'd go for:


-----------------Lee

Spillane--Osborne--Balkestein--Woodman

Wood--Diagouraga--O'Connor---Weston

---------Grabban--Alexander


Subs: Hamer, Legge, Adams, Saunders, Bean, Hunt, MacDonald/Hudson


I think Lee more than deserves a league start at last, and Forster needs his operation so we can see the best of him sooner rather than later.

Agreed but think AS will stick with Hamer. He may also be tempted to give Adams another start but more likely than not will stick with Wood on the right to add energy and drive to team.

 

[detours]

Agreed but think AS will stick with Hamer. He may also be tempted to give Adams another start but more likely than not will stick with Wood on the right to add energy and drive to team.

I would be happy for Wood to start, but think that Grabban is more likely going to get a start on the right. Wood on the bench with Adams, no Saunders.

 

[magicbees]

Hamer

Spillane
Osborne
Pim ( captain )
Woodman

Saunders
Diagouraga
KOC
Weston

Grabban
Forster

Well..........Andy said he wants us to keep the ball !!

Andy said he wants to keep the ball better. lollol

 

[davewfilms]

Brentford:- Hamer; Spillane, Osborne, Legge, Woodman; Grabban, Diagouraga, O'Connor, Weston; MacDonald, Forster

 

[WisBee]

Brentford:- Hamer; Spillane, Osborne, Legge, Woodman; Grabban, Diagouraga, O'Connor, Weston; MacDonald, Forster

................subs are named as Lee, Balkestein, McCracken, Hunt, Bean, Adams, Wood, Alexander....................I thought we were only allowed seven subs??.......................




Saunders to be out on loan someday soon?? (Wycombe/D&R/Gills??)

 

[davewfilms]

Yes only 7 subs allowed

 

[WisBee]

Yes only 7 subs allowed

.......................let's hope we don't get three or more points deducted for having an 'ineligible' player then..................I always knew that that the home dugout would lead to something like this!......................