Transfer naivety
Does anyone else get the feeling there's something very naive about our financial management of transfers? There are many selling clubs at this level and most of them seem to be much shrewder than our management.
We seem to be being squeezed at both ends, getting lowish fees for the players we sell (Turner, and Sodje if the 300 grand to Swansea story is true) and then also suffering from hefty sell-on clauses.
Yeading were canny enough about DJ and Charlton doubly so, given how insignificant a player Turner was for them.
Meanwhile, most of the additional clauses we manage to wrangle are so ludicrous as to be almost worthless (Paul Smith playing for England, DJ scoring 20 goals a season in the Prem).
This trend goes back several years. Was it Holdsworth who we sold before without any sell on - I can't remember. But the point is that we seem pretty poor at maximising the very transfer income which we so need to stay afloat.
We seem to be being squeezed at both ends, getting lowish fees for the players we sell (Turner, and Sodje if the 300 grand to Swansea story is true) and then also suffering from hefty sell-on clauses.
Yeading were canny enough about DJ and Charlton doubly so, given how insignificant a player Turner was for them.
Meanwhile, most of the additional clauses we manage to wrangle are so ludicrous as to be almost worthless (Paul Smith playing for England, DJ scoring 20 goals a season in the Prem).
This trend goes back several years. Was it Holdsworth who we sold before without any sell on - I can't remember. But the point is that we seem pretty poor at maximising the very transfer income which we so need to stay afloat.
Chron said Sam was going for £1m a couple of weeks ago! 
)