WBA v The BEES
- Thread starter bees66
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 141
- Views 6K
RitchBee
Come up Screaming !!
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2001
- Messages
- 6,605
- Reaction score
- 359
WBA v The BEES
We need to get some experienced blood in quick.
Just like winning , losing can become a bad habit.
Have you seen our bench tonight.
QPR just scored ! Bo**ocks
Just like winning , losing can become a bad habit.
Have you seen our bench tonight.
QPR just scored ! Bo**ocks
RitchBee
Come up Screaming !!
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2001
- Messages
- 6,605
- Reaction score
- 359
WBA v The BEES
Will the board please sit up and take notice for christ sake !.
8 goals in just two games doesn't that tell you something.
As I said before look at our bench tonight.
8 goals in just two games doesn't that tell you something.
As I said before look at our bench tonight.
Bigbee
Well-known member
WBA v The BEES
calm down
lets get things into perspective guys,read wba site b4 todays game. look at their team,were leagues lower literaly and in money and again weve had a man sent off .Dont shoot Wally just yet
lets get things into perspective guys,read wba site b4 todays game. look at their team,were leagues lower literaly and in money and again weve had a man sent off .Dont shoot Wally just yet
King Bee
Former BU board member, working in pharma land
WBA v The BEES
Originally posted by King Bee
SACK DOWNES NOW! Clearly he showed tactical naivety by playing Smith instead of the mercurial Julian in goal when everybody else could see otherwise.
And I thought the Americans were the only ones who didn't understand irony....
RitchBee
Come up Screaming !!
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2001
- Messages
- 6,605
- Reaction score
- 359
WBA v The BEES
Calm Down !!!
We've had the summer to sort things and nothing has been done.
Why didn't Roget Play ?.
We've had the summer to sort things and nothing has been done.
Why didn't Roget Play ?.
SigiBee
Member
WBA v The BEES
What happened to Evans and Roget? I thought we were all supposed to be fit other than Jeremy........ Its maybe too early to cast aspersions on control values but two off in two games? At this rate the under 16's will be playing by October. Please let Saturday be a red-free zone
GP
Active member
WBA v The BEES
Re: calm down
got to agree. Did we really expect to come away with a result bearing in mind that WBA played their strongest line up tonight. Was always going to be difficult with 11 men let alone 10. Tranmere & West Brom are 2 of the hardest games possible for the opening games.
Saturdays game against Peterboro will probably give us a better idea if things really are as bad as they seem. Difficult to keep positive but lets give it a few more games yet.
Bigbee said:
got to agree. Did we really expect to come away with a result bearing in mind that WBA played their strongest line up tonight. Was always going to be difficult with 11 men let alone 10. Tranmere & West Brom are 2 of the hardest games possible for the opening games.
Saturdays game against Peterboro will probably give us a better idea if things really are as bad as they seem. Difficult to keep positive but lets give it a few more games yet.
RitchBee
Come up Screaming !!
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2001
- Messages
- 6,605
- Reaction score
- 359
C'mon uu Bees
INVALID EMAIL
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2003
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
WBA v The BEES
MiddxBee said:
who also kept calling Sonko 'Sonico' early in the game.
The main commentator was equally as crap, struggling to name our players early on 'the defender on the far side' being just one quote. He then went on say that we could now concentrate on the league until at least January !!! Maybe we've got a bye to the 3rd round and I didn't know.
Another sh*t Capital Gold Nationwide coverage.
Well done to the team by the way who I thought battled excellently for 70 mins. It's gonna be a bloody long season though unless the higher echelons of our club wake up fast.
Let's start the season again on Sat by kicking Barry Fry's fat arse.
JonnieGee
INVALID EMAIL
WBA v The BEES
Another thing Tony Gale said at the end was that its going to be a long hard season for Wally and he'll do well to keep the team in the Division. He said we were physically light-weight and needed a greater physical presence in the team.
I have to say I agree with him.
I have to say I agree with him.
RitchBee
Come up Screaming !!
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2001
- Messages
- 6,605
- Reaction score
- 359
WBA v The BEES
Does he (Gale) want to be our next manager ?.
He at least seems to know were some of our problems are.
He at least seems to know were some of our problems are.
Sultan
Well-known member
WBA v The BEES
RitchBee said:
It tells me that we played the majority of both of these games against two better sides with only ten men. We will not be signing any player on a decent wage because we don't have the money, hence the kids on the bench. Give the lads a bit of time, i'm sure they will do a job, although I can't see us winning the league.
Jimbee
Who's the dummy?
WBA v The BEES
Call me fussy but perhaps we can start to judge things in a better perspective when we start finishing games (or even the 1st half) with 11 men on the pitch.
Whitton Borders Bee
Active member
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2002
- Messages
- 1,097
- Reaction score
- 515
WBA v The BEES
JonnieGee said:
I also tend to agree. Peters & Tabb in the same line up for instance.
beezy babe
Blonde Boozy & Brentford
WBA v The BEES
Well thanks guys, just got back from WBA and now I have just re-lived it all through this thread!!!
I thought we had some pretty good play int he first half. The goal was pretty much against play - we had about 20 minutes when we were on top of them but (needless to say) couldn't score. I saw 3 or 4 crosses sail past the goal with no-one to get a foot or head to them! Smith's sending off was a nightmare, not sure that the ref had much choice though. And as for replacing Peters, well I didn't think Peter's had been looking that good so wasn't too upset when Wally took him off for Julian.
One of our major problems IMHO is that we don't use the width of the pitch at all. WBA were constantly using wide passes that we had no chance of getting to. Our players show their inexperience by chasing the ball at every opportunity and that is simply not going to work against a team that take advantage of the whole pitch.
It wasn't all negative though. I thought we looked better than on Saturday anyway. Lets just hope that conceding four goals and having a player sent off isn't going to be a habit!
I thought we had some pretty good play int he first half. The goal was pretty much against play - we had about 20 minutes when we were on top of them but (needless to say) couldn't score. I saw 3 or 4 crosses sail past the goal with no-one to get a foot or head to them! Smith's sending off was a nightmare, not sure that the ref had much choice though. And as for replacing Peters, well I didn't think Peter's had been looking that good so wasn't too upset when Wally took him off for Julian.
One of our major problems IMHO is that we don't use the width of the pitch at all. WBA were constantly using wide passes that we had no chance of getting to. Our players show their inexperience by chasing the ball at every opportunity and that is simply not going to work against a team that take advantage of the whole pitch.
It wasn't all negative though. I thought we looked better than on Saturday anyway. Lets just hope that conceding four goals and having a player sent off isn't going to be a habit!
California Bee
Well-known member
WBA v The BEES
Jimbee said:
Undisciplined play results in sendings-off. This team appears to need some focus and attention to fundamentals. Let's hope we can turn it around quickly. Ourr excuses will not carry beyond the game against Peterborough.