NorthamptonBee
Yes Boss
James McClean
The bloke is a *****, my parents are Irish but still where poppies. Lots of Irish people died in the war.
It is about remembrance for the war dead, not the troubles in ireland. Grade A c##t!
Well said.
The bloke is a *****, my parents are Irish but still where poppies. Lots of Irish people died in the war.
It is about remembrance for the war dead, not the troubles in ireland. Grade A c##t!
I heard that JD probably wouldn't have worn one had he played yesterday. Doesn't bother me at all.
Do you know this as a fact?
If so I'd like Jonathan to come and out and say so....
If his German manager and Argentinian managers and players can show their respect then he has no excuse.
Yet another who hates Britain but not quite enough to turn down the massive salary .
Yes its a personal choice not to buy one but this is one day a year when his club play in a shirt with a poppy on. Every other player and club in Britain except one* managed to do it.
Absolutely agree. Haven't read all of this thread. Did he stay quiet for the minutes silence in honour of the war dead? Because by his logic he shouldn't.
Who cares. Wear one or don't for your own reasons. It's a free country after all. You should respect those that died for that, but you don't have to for that exact same reason too.
The bloke is a *****, my parents are Irish but still where poppies. Lots of Irish people died in the war.
It is about remembrance for the war dead, not the troubles in ireland. Grade A c##t!
Totally disagree - I care.
Totally disagree - I care.
But you can't and shouldn't force people to wear poppies, neither should we be calling out people who choose not too. That would start to resemble the idelogies of exactly what we were fighting.
Theres a difference between not wearing a poppy and refusing to play in a football shirt with a poppy on.
whats the difference?
Because you can choose not to wear a poppy if you like but refusing to wear it on the shirt of the club paying you 1000's a week is wrong imho.
Disgusting actions. As Bernard Manning so eloquently put it these ****ers helped restock the German U boats in the Second World War.
Only a few underground republicans helped the Germans in the last war, while hundreds of thousands signed up to the British army. They also did the very same in the first world war while only a few thousand took part in the 'rising' of 1916.
Some people on here have an 'Us and them' attitude about too many subjects.
A lot of the right wing thinking keyboard army (on here) have been happy to sing anti Irish songs at football, but done f*ck all about the massive immigration problem that has run out of control over the last few decades (sitting on their hands and not voting e.g.)
Empires over the years have successfully divided and conquered, but the peoples of these Islands do an even better job of dividing themselves.
Isn't it time to move on and respect each others past at the same time; whatever their view?
Do you know this as a fact?
If so I'd like Jonathan to come and out and say so....
As this is a pretty big allegation...
Didnt see that dreadful comment from Thorne In the Side. Highly insulting and ignorant. Clearly didnt bother watching the rememberance event where the Irish Ambasador was present to represent the Irish dead from two world wars.
The most iconic moment, to gauge Irish opinion, was when the England Rugby team played at Croke park a few years ago, which was the scene of a massacre by the British Army in the early 20's. It also has a stand called Hill 16, which was formed from the rubble of the Rising in 1916.
Everyone wondered what the reaction would be when an English team visited, playing an english game.
As the English anthem played you couldn't here a pin drop out of respect and also to show that the 82,000 in the stadium had moved on!
Some people on here should do the same.....it's F*CKING BORING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If his German manager and Argentinian managers and players can show their respect then he has no excuse.
Yet another who hates Britain but not quite enough to turn down the massive salary .
Yes its a personal choice not to buy one but this is one day a year when his club play in a shirt with a poppy on. Every other player and club in Britain except one* managed to do it.
*no prizes for guessing who
Boiled down to its simplest terms, here's what I think the position is as far as I'm concerned.
1) Should the poppy be a personal choice?
2) Should you have to justify your choice?
3) Should your employer have the right to force you to wear it?
4) Should other people have the right to condemn you for your personal choice?
The other questions I have in my head are - should the poppy stand only for British soldiers, British and Commonwealth soldiers or for any soldiers? And should it only be for the World Wars, or for any war?
Thoughts?
No as it didn't come from JD's mouth, and I don't know him personally.
Dangerous allegation that mate -
He is quite entitled to hold the views on the Poppy which he outlined in his letter.Him being a fenian and the general discussions around poppy wearing are too different things though aren't they.
I just don't know what you're getting at here? You believe that the occupation of Ireland was right?For those not in the know, that little badge is an Easter Lily, worn by extreme Republicans (effectively IRA supporters) in "honour" of the IRA Rising in Easter 1916.
For someone whose letter claimed that he respected those who fought and died in WW1, that hardly squares with his support for a tiny, unrepresentative gang who took arms against the British at a time when over 200,000 Irishmen were fighting in the British Army against the Germans during the Great War.
I just don't know what you're getting at here? You believe that the occupation of Ireland was right?
Please clarify why the lily and his views are incompatible...
This is nothing to do with the "Occupation of Ireland" [sic].I just don't know what you're getting at here? You believe that the occupation of Ireland was right?
Please clarify why the lily and his views are incompatible...
I was going to give my well-considered rationale and a full scale analysis, but this says it all to me.
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/foo...-to-wear-poppies-on-their-shirts-9851442.html
However, the poppy argument seems to be more about playing the man than the ball at the moment (tbh, it's become a symbol that's used to tar people, ironically rather like the white feather).
I wear a poppy, but I can see the justification behind McClean's argument - I must admit I'd never seen it in those terms before.
Boiled down to its simplest terms, here's what I think the position is as far as I'm concerned.
1) Should the poppy be a personal choice?
2) Should you have to justify your choice?
3) Should your employer have the right to force you to wear it?
4) Should other people have the right to condemn you for your personal choice?
The other questions I have in my head are - should the poppy stand only for British soldiers, British and Commonwealth soldiers or for any soldiers? And should it only be for the World Wars, or for any war?
Thoughts?
The point about a company uniform is that it is necessary towards doing the job, and/or reinforces a common identity and unity amongst all the workforce.Point three...should your employer force you to wear a uniform... the team shirt ? He has now set a precedent for players to say they don't want to wear the shirt because they don't agree with whatever is printed on it....
Why should an individual have to suffer because he holds views which contradict the orthodoxy? I thought that the freedom to dissent was one of the reasons we (UK) fought the two World Wars.It was Wigan Athletic Football Clubs recognition of Remembrance day not an individual player. If he felt that strongly about it he should have withdrawn from the team then he might have earned some respect ...
The poppy was a method to raise funds for disabled ex-servicemen and was focused on Armistice Day. It has been subsequently hijacked by Church and State for "Remembrance Sunday" which is a lot different.The other questions I have in my head are - should the poppy stand only for British soldiers, British and Commonwealth soldiers or for any soldiers? And should it only be for the World Wars, or for any war?
To me - the poppy is about everyone that has been killed in conflict - soldiers or civilians - all countries.
I've got news for you - the British Army stationed in Ireland were a foreign, occupying force - they weren't fighting WWI.In his letter to Whelan, McClean claimed that he respected those British Army servicemen who fought in WW1.
Yet at the same time, he expresses his support for the tiny, unrepresentative and unelected band of rebels who rose against the British Army in Ireland, at the same time as their colleagues were dying in Flanders and elsewhere.
there from two different countriesReally? Dangerous ?
Irishman maybe doesn't wear a poppy shocker. Wanderer Paul has put this to bed above, move on.
Point three...should your employer force you to wear a uniform... the team shirt ? He has now set a precedent for players to say they don't want to wear the shirt because they don't agree with whatever is printed on it....
It was Wigan Athletic Football Clubs recognition of Remembrance day not an individual player. If he felt that strongly about it he should have withdrawn from the team then he might have earned some respect ...
Wasn't there a case recently where a footballer felt that he couldn't wear a shirt because it went against what he believed in as a Moslem?
Wasn't there a case recently where a footballer felt that he couldn't wear a shirt because it went against what he believed in as a Moslem?
I think you can look to the way Brentford handled a similar issue about wearing a kit to support a campaign exactly two months ago today. The statement reads:I assume the player is under contract to wear the company uniform .The club chose to add the poppy to their uniform. I'm sure some players have strong opinions about the products advertised on their shirts. It's an endorsement by the club not an individual player.
"Why should an individual have to suffer because he holds views which contradict the orthodoxy? I thought that the freedom to dissent was one of the reasons we (UK) fought the two World Wars."
He was free to dissent by not playing ...as was Eric Liddle...Euan Murray.
Just before War broke out, the British Government passed an Act granting Home Rule to Ireland, which had to be suspended with the outbreak of hostilities.I've got news for you - the British Army stationed in Ireland were a foreign, occupying force - they weren't fighting WWI.
Just as the Great War is commemorated by the Irish Government eg in Enniskillen and London earlier this week:And the Easter 1916 rebels are celebrated in Ireland today. But have it your way :shrug:
I think you can look to the way Brentford handled a similar issue about wearing a kit to support a campaign exactly two months ago today. The statement reads:
“The players are aware of the campaign and have been given rainbow laces. We are, however, very clear that it has to be an individual choice. All players have routines and superstitions regarding the way they prepare for a match and no-one would want to disrupt that.”
It's quite clearly an individual choice. Close thread.
No one can be forced to wear a poppy - that's really the end of it.From 'tinternet..."In soccer, jersey and team sponsors are out of the hands of the player. Kits are manufactured by the likes of Adidas, Nike, Puma and Warrior. As a player in this instance, you wear what the team wears. However, boots, cleats, shoes – or whatever you want to call them – are the one piece of equipment which are fair game."
Boots and laces are an individuals choice, shirts are not. Reopen thread.
I've got news for you - the British Army stationed in Ireland were a foreign, occupying force - they weren't fighting WWI.
And the Easter 1916 rebels are celebrated in Ireland today. But have it your way :shrug:
No one can be forced to wear a poppy - that's really the end of it.
Or maybe you'd like him deported to Ireland for hate speech :shrug: