Pretty much, thanks for not switching me off, although for all the use it's doing I might as well go back

I knew he was out of contract, I just still think that really a club should own the player and when the player moves even after the contract ends the club should get some money. Hey, call me old fashioned, I feel that it screws lower league clubs because they run on a very tight budget so can't afford to offer long-term contracts to players so more often than not they're only in for one or two years then they can move on to a bigger club where they earn that team more money in the long term. I see it as equivalent to renting someone's house and paying their mortgage, you're doing the donkey work at a high risk to yourself (as you're contracted into renting and can't afford not to have a job) and then at the end of it all that person did almost nothing to pay that house off. Bigger teams get talent from smaller clubs for free, meanwhile the smaller clubs have to risk their existence on the next 3 or 4 bright young sparks or end up relegated and insolvent. It's the general flow of all the money and talent upwards with seemingly almost nothing coming back downwards that I have a problem with.