Lionel Bart-At
formerly known as 'heavywoollenbee'
Mathias Jensen
This is so much more productive than circular discussions about Mathias Jensen. We've even diversified into mice, from hamsters. What's not to like?
Ohhhh I see lolWear on the stare? Write their!
(a little mouse with clogs on, etc...)
A thread worthy of Steinbeck.This is so much more productive than circular discussions about Mathias Jensen. We've even diversified into mice, from hamsters. What's not to like?
Of Mice and Mathias, here at the Wayward Bus Stop in the Summer of our Discontent.A thread worthy of Steinbeck.
No one wants to buy him ?? I’m truly shocked ??No goals. No assists. Sell him. Close thread.
I agree…oh and he played ok in a very poor midfield but it was no better than ok…a few decent passes is great but still doesn’t get forward enough with the ball and still lost it too easily…set pieces were average and nowhere near what we were getting with CE…which is where the major problem this season will now be…if anyone can’t see that then I give up ?
For all you Jensen haters out there, try and find something wrong with this pass please. I beg
Have a day off mate1 good pass in a game doesn’t make up for constantly going missing in games and shirking tackles - my opinion
Where will you wear that?I think we should invent whe’re (where are) and wheir (of where’s) just for fun.
MJ puts in plenty of tackles i think your getting your danes mixed up it was CE that didn't tackle.1 good pass in a game doesn’t make up for constantly going missing in games and shirking tackles - my opinion
He's frequently in the 'number of tackles' top 5 stat across the two teams in a match report, been top, too. But don't let stats spoil a good pre-conception.MJ puts in plenty of tackles i think your getting your danes mixed up it was CE that didn't tackle.
I still don't get this complete misconception. I mean, do people watch the same game as us?MJ puts in plenty of tackles i think your getting your danes mixed up it was CE that didn't tackle.
Don't let, watching a game get in the way of a devisive stat.He's frequently in the 'number of tackles' top 5 stat across the two teams in a match report, been top, too. But don't let stats spoil a good pre-conception.
Well I can't see it - will you now keep your promise?…if anyone can’t see that then I give up ?
Just my opinion mate I think he goes missing to much and doesn’t put his foot in and does to many floaty passes that don’t come off, but he does occasionally have a decent game.MJ puts in plenty of tackles i think your getting your danes mixed up it was CE that didn't tackle.
For all you Jensen haters out there, try and find something wrong with this pass please. I beg
You posted this on Monday- post 4409.
and I’m sure we’ll see it again, soon…??????You posted this on Monday- post 4409.
You can blame it all on @Les Beeavinu as far as I’m concerned.You posted this on Monday- post 4409.
It’s a cracking idea…..I've got an idea.
Why don't we all just pretend that he is a new player that we have signed for let's say 10 million.
Draw a line under whatever we like or dislike and judge him over the first 10 games of this season.
No preconceptions on either side. Only after the first 10 games.
Just an idea .
10 games is too long... 3 is enough to use our eyes and not use statistics as a substitute for good old fashioned observation.I've got an idea.
Why don't we all just pretend that he is a new player that we have signed for let's say 10 million.
Draw a line under whatever we like or dislike and judge him over the first 10 games of this season.
No preconceptions on either side. Only after the first 10 games.
Just an idea .
I don't see why it's unrealistic mate. Surely all the people on here would love him to have a good season and help us push to the top half of the league.It’s a cracking idea…..
…..,.but completely unrealistic. ???
Well you would think so. In reality though it’s a big ask for someone to shed bias or prejudice which tends to be very subconscious. Some of the people who rely on “good old observation” may still only see what they want to see. Would love to be proved wrong.I don't see why it's unrealistic mate. Surely all the people on here would love him to have a good season and help us push to the top half of the league.
Why would any Brentford support want him to fall just to prove a petty point?
It's unrealistic because, poor old Matty polarises opinion (quite extremely sometimes). So him playing some people will use words like 'immense' or 'best player' whilst others will say 'pants' or 'worst player'I don't see why it's unrealistic mate. Surely all the people on here would love him to have a good season and help us push to the top half of the league.
Why would any Brentford support want him to fall just to prove a petty point?
It is said that 'if you have an ice cream, you are statistically more likely to drown' and statistics will bear that out. I'm gonna have an icecream. Stats is devisiveWell you would think so. In reality though it’s a big ask for someone to shed bias or prejudice which tends to be very subconscious. Some of the people who rely on “good old observation” may still only see what they want to see. Would love to be proved wrong.
Some of us are able to offer an unbiased, objective perspective, using the evidence of our own observations, as you suggest, to list perceived strengths AND areas for development. It’s never black and white.It's unrealistic because, poor old Matty polarises opinion (quite extremely sometimes). So him playing some people will use words like 'immense' or 'best player' whilst others will say 'pants' or 'worst player'
Yep that's me. What about you?Some of us are able to offer an unbiased, objective perspective, using the evidence of our own observations, as you suggest, to list perceived strengths AND areas for development. It’s never black and white.
Did I mention statistics? I have previously pointed out precisely why statistics relating to this player are misleading.It is said that 'if you have an ice cream, you are statistically more likely to drown' and statistics will bear that out. I'm gonna have an icecream. Stats is devisive
You know why Matthew Benham asks all his relevant employees, particularly the scouting teams, to read the relevant chapters of Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow, those dealing with cognitive biases, particularly confirmation bias? Plus the overconfidence effect?I don't see why it's unrealistic mate. Surely all the people on here would love him to have a good season and help us push to the top half of the league.
Why would any Brentford support want him to fall just to prove a petty point?
I’m sorry, this is statement is completely arse about face.Yep that's me. What about you?
Yes I was referring to my OWN distinction between stats and good old fashioned observation.Did I mention statistics? I have previously pointed out precisely why statistics relating to this player are misleading.
What you are doing here, in my opinion, is demonstrating exactly the phenomenon to which I was referring in my previous post. You expected me to talk stats, so you assumed I did. You expect Jensen to play poorly so you only “observe” instances of his play which back up your theories. Am I wrong?
Hence why I said just keep it basic. He had a rubbish game or a good game. I know it's not going to happen.It's unrealistic because, poor old Matty polarises opinion (quite extremely sometimes). So him playing some people will use words like 'immense' or 'best player' whilst others will say 'pants' or 'worst player'
So why were you quoting, and taking issue with, my post, in which there was not one single mention of statistics. No offence, but I think you may be losing the plot here. Go pick on a statto.Yes I was referring to my OWN distinction between stats and good old fashioned observation.
BlimeySo why were you quoting, and taking issue with, my post, in which there was not one single mention of statistics. No offence, but I think you may be losing the plot here. Go pick on a statto.
Fair enough ...but a whole season..Hence why I said just keep it basic. He had a rubbish game or a good game. I know it's not going to happen.
Just judge the bloke on what does this season.
Unfortunately for the ones that don't rate him, he will play most of the games for us this year. Support not groan. Maybe we might even stay up. COYR
No 10 games mate.Fair enough ...but a whole season..
Yes the WHOLE season. Top top player!Fair enough ...but a whole season..
You couldn’t see what colour orange juice is ??Well I can't see it - will you now keep your promise?
Can we make it 3 games instead ? 10 games and we could be bottom of the league ??I've got an idea.
Why don't we all just pretend that he is a new player that we have signed for let's say 10 million.
Draw a line under whatever we like or dislike and judge him over the first 10 games of this season.
No preconceptions on either side. Only after the first 10 games.
Just an idea .
With respect RR nobody in their right mind smashes into tackles any more. Recipe for cards and dangerous free kicks. MJ is as brave as anyone in the tackle but sensible enough to know when and where to make a challenge. Maybe this is where the misconception originates?No 10 games mate.
Imagine you was going into work and you heard everything though you was rubbish at your job. Do you think it would not Dent your confidence?
We all want the same thing. All I'm saying is support our players that are selected. Doesn't mean we can't have an option but Matt seems to get in worse. Maybe it's because he tries to make things happen and the pass doesn't always work. I'm sure that most of the against on here is because he doesn't smash into tackles. He isn't that sort of player. Anyway I've said enough.
Support our team. It's going to be a hard season x