RitchBee
Come up Screaming !!
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2001
- Messages
- 6,601
- Reaction score
- 354
Edmundo said:
RitchBee said:At least it puts some coffers into the kitty.
It isn't a decision for the BU Board though, is it?Sweepy said:You may have heard, but has everyone on the BU committee been consulted this time? lol![]()
Edmundo said:It isn't a decision for the BU Board though, is it?![]()
Do you want a long essay on the difference between BFC and BU and what "non-executive" means?Sweepy said:Oh yeah, I forgot... Noades is still in charge. Via Eddie Rogers!![]()
Edmundo said:Do you want a long essay on the difference between BFC and BU and what "non-executive" means?![]()
Edmundo said:Do you want a long essay on ..... what "non-executive" means?![]()
Have to agree with all of the above...Sweepy said:Being an executive was not my point anyway, and Edmundo knows that, for I hardly think the words "Edmund" and "executive" are often seen in the same sentence anyway. However, dear Eddy Baby always seems to know everything. Then he uses his insider knowledge to stamp his superiority on the board, with his little smilies, the "I know something you don't know" game, and the shooting down in flames of those less knowldgeable. Then Eddy Baby and Bish, amongst others, wonder why only four people show up to help out BU events.
Some people seem to be told what is going on at every turn (regardless of their status), and some people always seem to be the last to know, as I am sure David and Alan would testify!
Let us stop being childish and concentrate on sorting out the mess Ron left.
Says he of the transfer talk put downs.markbfc said:Have to agree with all of the above...
Sweepy said:Let us stop being childish and concentrate on sorting out the mess Ron left.
Banana said:Says he of the transfer talk put downs.
So we might get gazza then!!!!!!!!markbfc said:it's not due to prior knowledge - just a bout of common sense
hants in my pants said:blimey. even i`d watch the football if we signed him.
worth his considerable wieght in gold that man.
Amsterdam Bee said:Just out of interest, what sort of money does a club of our size command for shirt sponsoship?
What p!ssed me off was seeing Wycombe have apparently signed a £100k + deal for their shirts, if this is true then why the **** are they a more attractive proposition for shirt sponsors than we are? They're sh*te & we're a community club who will be getting a lot of press coverage for the fact. [/B]
Loughtonbee said:Apparently although the new sponsors are paying us less than GMB, GMB will be continuing with some form of sponsorship & the nett effect will be about the same, that's what I heard at the BIAS meeting
Loughtonbee said:
What p!ssed me off was seeing Wycombe have apparently signed a £100k + deal for their shirts, if this is true then why the **** are they a more attractive proposition for shirt sponsors than we are? They're sh*te & we're a community club who will be getting a lot of press coverage for the fact.
Ah, but we'd cunningly placed a large free spread bet (as a result of a sponsorship deal for the walk) on a Wycombe victory, thus earning the supporters' trust £850 odd!the_wwfc said:tsk, tsk, such bitterness...sh*te that beats you 4-0, anyway. And that's how your team rewards a 26-mile walk. rofl
WarrenBee said:With a non league mentality.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
CJC said:"What p!ssed me off was seeing Wycombe have apparently signed a £100k + deal for their shirts, if this is true then why the **** are they a more attractive proposition for shirt sponsors than we are?"
Might have evidence their fans are wealthier on average than us and younger so capturing a "better" market? I don't know anything about Wycombe so I'm guessing. Also could have more opportunities and services e.g. the sponsors get a corporate box.