BURFORD BEE
Well-known member
Mark Warburton
I propose a vote of thanks to Mr Whelan. The very best thing that happened to our season was for Warbs to take over the reins.
Very positive interview and feature on Gillette Soccer Saturday on Sky Sports at 10 to 3. Phil Thompson, Charlie Nicholas and Paul Merson all highly complimentary (and we also learn Merse's mate is a kitman at GP!).![]()
Very positive interview and feature on Gillette Soccer Saturday on Sky Sports at 10 to 3. Phil Thompson, Charlie Nicholas and Paul Merson all highly complimentary (and we also learn Merse's mate is a kitman at GP!).![]()
Of course it was
What sort of run are Wigan on? Aren't they in the Q/F of the FA Cup too?
I notice you've now edited your post. It was previously just the rolling eyes I believe.
I really couldn't care less what sort of run Wigan are on. What has that got to do with my post?
My point was that the team are performing far better with a manager committed to attacking football and that the only reason that we are in this happy position is that Whelan approached our previous manager or the other way round depending on what account you wish to believe.
I notice you've now edited your post. It was previously just the rolling eyes I believe.
I really couldn't care less what sort of run Wigan are on. What has that got to do with my post?
My point was that the team are performing far better with a manager committed to attacking football and that the only reason that we are in this happy position is that Whelan approached our previous manager or the other way round depending on what account you wish to believe.
Of course it was
What sort of run are Wigan on? Aren't they in the Q/F of the FA Cup too?
Wigan were 9 points off the play offs with 2 games in hand when Rosler took over. They are now 7 points off the play offs with 2 games in hand. I think we were third when Warbs came in, 4 points off the top. Now we are top 5 points clear of third with a game in hand. Same old Brentford, lose are best manager for decades and **** it up. :mad1:
No plan b today. For me, we were the better team for the first 15 mins of the second half. The game was quite bitty and getting physical. McCormack should have gone into the middle (Saville off) & Grigg should have come on for Trotta.
Saville was far better than Adam today who was given a bit of a lesson by MacDonald. Personally I would have also put Mac in middle and told him to get at MacDonald.
Really think subs she have been made earlier
I actually think MacDonalds was vulnerable and there to be got at, as he always wanted the ball but looked shaky when he got it, if we'd had pressed him as well as we did at Molineux he'd have been anonymous today
Really think subs she have been made earlier
I'm a bit worried that we don't have a viable plan B with the players we've got at our disposal.
When you have a £350,000 player on the bench and he doesn't warrant more than 6 mins in a game where we are losing makes me think Warbs is not that confident in him.
I actually think MacDonalds was vulnerable and there to be got at, as he always wanted the ball but looked shaky when he got it, if we'd had pressed him as well as we did at Molineux he'd have been anonymous today
Thats why Mac should have been on him
But then Sako would have had Yennaris all day IMO.
And?
Saville was far better than Adam today who was given a bit of a lesson by MacDonald. Personally I would have also put Mac in middle and told him to get at MacDonald.
So we needed two McCormacks today and we only had one
We seem to disagree on the midfield sonafabee, I was disappointed with George today. Didn't look to get on the ball and wasn't effective when on it. Well that is my opinion anyway.
I thought MacDonald had far more impact and influence than Sako IMHO.
Sorry but the breadman needs to know when to use subs
Because McCormack was on Sako. Had McCormack been on MacDonald it would have been the other way around
I don't think anyone on the bench would have made a difference which is a problem in itself.
I didn't think Mac played that well and don't think Sako is a player who works all game anyway.
Have we written off The Arsenal lad already?
I didn't think Mac played that well and don't think Sako is a player who works all game anyway.
Have we written off The Arsenal lad already?
W/P UP TILL TODAY 100% BUT today he got it wrong imhoHe's made they right choices in nearly every game he's managed so far. One match and one defeat, he now doesn't know when to use them? Rubbish.
Not written him off, I'm confident he can become a valuable player for us - but to risk him in a massive game against a big powerful Winger when we know power isn't a strong suit having never really played senior football, when we know Macca has been excellent at RB would seem silly IMO
Who knows? You're probably right but in my opinion the best player on the park was MacDonald as he had the freedom of GP- he certainly wouldn't have enjoyed the same time and space with Macca in the middle?
I cannot agree more.We lacked a Macca in the middle to upset their formation and that was where we lost the game from very early on.
They had a rigid formation that was difficult to break down and we lacked the guile in the middle to disrupt it.Macca would have been a pain in the butt to Macdonald and co.
Saw that after 5 minutes.
Tbh, I thought Douglas performed the role you're suggesting Macca should have played extremely well today but he was the only midfielder to get amongst the Wolves midfield IMO.
Absolutely right. I prefer Mac in a midfield position, he did ok at right back today against a decent player. Dougie was one if the few to do himself justice today.
............who would you drop to accommodate Alan.............
I had no problem starting with the formation we did but I'd have hooked Adam or Sav early second half today and put Mac back in middle.