I don't mean to be overly critical and I will add some supporting context, however let’s be real: He stood out as a weak link all game, and he did so at Wolves as well.
He didn’t
just get beat for the Bournemouth goal, did he? Quite a few other hairy moments across both games.
View attachment 62488
Overall, I agree with you I don’t think there’s an “issue”. But I’d prefer to call it like it is, he’s not good enough, particularly post-injury, to be seen as our “starting” left-back, especially long term.
I am glad he’s fit after the injury problems. For KA it’s depth at left-back we’ve not had in recent seasons, it helps us manage gametime responsibly for Hickey and Ajer too both of whom have had their own injury issues. It’s meant Meghoma could go out on loan too.
So in the sense that we can call upon Henry to start matches — this season — when the fixtures are piling up and minutes are needing to be managed, we are in a privileged position. But should we look at his levels and think “this is our long term first choice left-back”? No.
It’s like we had with Roerslev at RB really. I just think people view Rico differently because at one time pre-injury he was first name on the team-sheet, and there’s an expectation it should go back to that eventually.