.................looks like it has been ditched.............
It worked twice in about 10 months. Waste of a throw in.....except those two times.
...............so................not a complete waste of a throw in then..............
................no more long throws then................
............at last.............it's back............
While not producing a goal, when the opposition defence is at sixes-and-sevens, loading the box with our bigger players who can head the ball and launching it in caused enough chaos to maybe have got something.
...............yep............back at Griffin Park............
ithe usual keeper collects under no pressure or defender clears and there isn't a Brentford player in sight
From what I have seen this tactic equates to about a 1% success rate, but I accept there is a time and place to do this, ie when there are about 5-10 minutes to go and we are losing/drawing and are basically desperate.
Broadly agree. A useful tactic to use once or twice in a game (but with someone standing near where he expects to throw it to), but not every time
Broadly agree. A useful tactic to use once or twice in a game (but with someone standing near where he expects to throw it to), but not every time
"Non-League"? Remind me again what League Stoke City are in?...........a very non league tactic from Orient today..........at every opportunity they used it...............
Didn't CD take some lomg throws back in the 2011-12 season? Boxing day vs Bournemouth for instance - before Legge got a late equaliser.
Long throw and we have a 50-50 chance of retaining control of the ball and a 50% need to battle to get it back; short throw and 4 or 5 passes back to Button and then probably 4 or 5 passes back out again, we've retained the ball and control of the game. Not only that, our opponents have had a 0% chance of scoring, that seems OK to me.
Remind me, how were Donaldson's and McCormack's goal scored on Saturday?

............have you been to the Ady Hoofroyd/Graham Taylor coaching weekend??????.........If you don't buy a ticket, you won't win the lottery.
Get the ball in the box and a chance is created.
Goals come from chances.
Wins come from goals.
That's percentage football.
OK, wise guy, let me rephrase that: Remind me, by which method and from which area of the pitch were the moves which lead to Donaldson's and McCormack's goals initiated on Saturday?
Maybe a slightly more potent weapon when you have a forward such as Farid who can actually compete in the air. Apart from him and Harlee we really don't have anyone who is a good offensive header of the ball.
If you don't buy a ticket, you won't win the lottery.
Get the ball in the box and a chance is created.
Goals come from chances.
Wins come from goals.
That's percentage football.

Long throw and we have a 50-50 chance of retaining control of the ball and a 50% need to battle to get it back; short throw and 4 or 5 passes back to Button and then probably 4 or 5 passes back out again, we've retained the ball and control of the game. Not only that, our opponents have had a 0% chance of scoring, that seems OK to me.
Yes, scrap this nice football crap. Bring back Andy Scott!![]()
....but I was talikng about the choice between a short, safe, cautious throw in and a chance creating, hopeful, opportunistic thrown in.
:scratch:
You would prefer we took a long throw and get the ball in the 'mix', than a cautious short throw, yes?