Mark Flekken (Closed Thread)
All good, happy with the three points either wayYou stick with your opinion, Zuko.
All good, happy with the three points either wayYou stick with your opinion, Zuko.
Yes. A worryingly lack of star jumps in the 6 yard box today. No surprise he let in a simple goal place in the corner of the net with no-one around to block the shot. Must do better.Bet he was cold.
I refrained from comment until I had seen in again on MOT as I had only seen it live. I will stick with my original thought that your post is total rubbish.Could have done better with the goal? Certainly left exposed for the chance in the first place but it’s not like the Luton lad’s then put it right in the corner
View attachment trim.6AA77A2F-C27E-4A93-91C7-04380FADB751.MOVI suspect there wasn't much he could have done, but the friend I was with (@red_and_white) was convinced it was poor keeping. Did anyone find a replay with a clear head-on angle? Motd was still not clear to me.
It was a daisy cutter ffs ?
Only have to see Janelt reaction after goal to know he was to blame.Sometimes harder to save closer to you.
More difficult to get down quickly.
Pick on the defender that didn’t clear the ball if you want to blame someone
He should of the shot wasn’t even hard trickled past himWas very close to him...I think he should have saved it
Frightened the life out of me!Harsh to blame him for the goal. He has been beaten a few times like that this season, including the American tour.
He could of been more dominant for the disallowed goal?
Steady performance in all without having much to do.
Once again, second to none with the ball at his feet.
Very odd that we're trying to make Flekken the culprit. ?Only have to see Janelt reaction after goal to know he was to blame.
Yep just seen the above replay. I'm inclined to agree.He should of the shot wasn’t even hard trickled past him
I felt that, it was quite close to him.Could have done better with the goal? Certainly left exposed for the chance in the first place but it’s not like the Luton lad’s then put it right in the corner
I think you’re wrong. It was a very good finish. Keepers read body shape to give an early clue of where the ball is likely to go. The Luton lad gave no clue the type of shot (if any) he was going to take. “Passing it into the net” almost.He should of the shot wasn’t even hard trickled past him
? it was a very well placed shot that Janelt should have cleared up long before a shot was possible. No way was Flekken at faultHe should of the shot wasn’t even hard trickled past him
I think your wrong he should of done better !I think you’re wrong. It was a very good finish. Keepers read body shape to give an early clue of where the ball is likely to go. The Luton lad gave no clue the type of shot (if any) he was going to take. “Passing it into the net” almost.
Paul Gascoigne scored loads of goals that way.
I think you’re wrong. It was a very good finish. Keepers read body shape to give an early clue of where the ball is likely to go. The Luton lad gave no clue the type of shot (if any) he was going to take. “Passing it into the net” almost.
Paul Gascoigne scored loads of goals that way.
Have you watched the above replay ?Spot on, it was a decent finish, simple as that.
Looks like the kind of goal that elite goalkeepers save. Flekken is not in that category in terms of shot stopping, but then very few are ?
Have you watched the above replay ?
****s will be ****s ?Very odd that we're trying to make Flekken the culprit. ?![]()
Why do you need to watch the entire game to have a view on one incident?Has anyone re watched the whole game yet to confirm if he touched the ball with his hands ?
The signs are good - very good in possession which is key to how we play. Does need to be more dominant in the air though which hopefully will come with time - the 2 catches last week show he is getting there slowly.As I said it’s pure confirmation bias. A lot of people on here have decided irrevocably that Flekken isn’t up to it and are simply seeing what they want to see to confirm their prejudice.
it is a repetition of what we have seen so many times in the past about the likes of Sawyers and Jensen.
It is far too soon to know if he will be a success or not but I think an open mind is called for.
I thought he could have done better with the goal but have no problem with his performances since the appendix episode. Very happy with him.As I said it’s pure confirmation bias. A lot of people on here have decided irrevocably that Flekken isn’t up to it and are simply seeing what they want to see to confirm their prejudice.
it is a repetition of what we have seen so many times in the past about the likes of Sawyers and Jensen.
It is far too soon to know if he will be a success or not but I think an open mind is called for.
I meant in the whole game !Why do you need to watch the entire game to have a view on one incident?
A shame you didn’t get a “there/their/they’re” error into that post, then you would have hit the jackpot.I think your wrong he should of done better !
tbf, I haven't seen any posts making him the culprit. Even the poster that started this off, suggesting he might have saved it, acknowledged the goal is down to Janelt and no-one else.Very odd that we're trying to make Flekken the culprit. ?![]()
Entire, whole not much difference, the clip on here is enough to see that Flekken is at full stretch attempting to save a shot a few inches off the ground at most. Enough information to have a view on how the GK didI meant in the whole game !
but, but, but,but, but,but, but,but, but it was a daisycutter and wasn't hit at one million miles an hour!Entire, whole not much difference, the clip on here is enough to see that Flekken is at full stretch attempting to save a shot a few inches off the ground at most. Enough information to have a view on how the GK did
You are missing the point….in the whole 100 minutes did flekken touch the ball with his hands !Entire, whole not much difference, the clip on here is enough to see that Flekken is at full stretch attempting to save a shot a few inches off the ground at most. Enough information to have a view on how the GK did
?Yep, my comments were based on that. It is not a goalkeeping error.
Hardly digging out players saying they should of saved a shot ffsI don't understand some of our support finding ways to dig out players.
Hardly digging out players saying they should of saved a shot ffs
Of course not.It was a daisy cutter ffs ?![]()
Unstoppable ???Talk about confirmation bias.
Their goal was pretty much unstoppable.
Yes it’s annoying when he conceded from their only effort on target but it wasn’t down to him.
Neither was Raya when we signed himOf course he is not in the same league as Raya, only a few GK are, and they cost £30 million in a heist!
Yes everytime he put it down for a goal kick ?You are missing the point….in the whole 100 minutes did flekken touch the ball with his hands !