Mark Phillips

Mark Phillips

...............he's behind you..............
 

Mark Phillips

The way I see it is that Wilson was only signed because Bennett got injured against Norwich and was going to be out for a few weeks. Whether or not he tried to sign him before that, nobody knows but I think it is more than a co-incidence that it happened at that time. This suggests to me that Scott was happy with Bennett and Phillips and now has even more options with Wilson here until January.

if that the case why did we extend to January after the initial month
 

Mark Phillips

I'm not sure of the exact date it was extended but i'm pretty sure it was at a time when both Bennett and Dickson were still injured.
 

Mark Phillips

The fact is Bennett lacks pace and is not a big centre half, therefore he has two areas of weakness - 1) Quick forwards who easily out pace him and secondly big forwards who out muscle him. I remember the 16 year old Ipswich striker who gave him all sorts of trouble in the pre-season game.........
Don't get me wrong, I like the guy but he isn't anywhere near the quality of Wilson.
 

Mark Phillips

I am a fan of Bennett and think Phillips has been one of our best players this season but still think talk of not playing Wilson is stupid, he is easily the best CB we have available!:nono:

Agree that he shouldn't come in for one of the full backs though!
 

Mark Phillips

I'm not sure of the exact date it was extended but i'm pretty sure it was at a time when both Bennett and Dickson were still injured.

it was extended on the last day of the transfer windon and Bennet was already back playing
 

Mark Phillips

The last day of the transfer window was september 1st, Bennett's first game back was huddersfield September 12th.
 

Mark Phillips

Just a thought guys - having seen Wilson play I think he should be in the team - and I wouldn't mind seeing him play in the midfield.
His runs from defence have been pretty effective and he is a natural ball winner. He has speed and he is capable of incisive passes - he would definitely "beef" up our central area......just a thought ..........!
 

Mark Phillips

Just a thought guys - having seen Wilson play I think he should be in the team - and I wouldn't mind seeing him play in the midfield.
His runs from defence have been pretty effective and he is a natural ball winner. He has speed and he is capable of incisive passes - he would definitely "beef" up our central area......just a thought ..........!

I have not seen many games this year but the ones i have seen Wilson looks like a very good footballer who could play at a higher level and the comments on here all seem to say the same thing he misses one game due to international duty and there are comment like leave him on the bench from what i have seen he should be in the team at centre back for either AB or MP lets let AS make that decision
 

Mark Phillips

Just a thought guys - having seen Wilson play I think he should be in the team - and I wouldn't mind seeing him play in the midfield.
His runs from defence have been pretty effective and he is a natural ball winner. He has speed and he is capable of incisive passes - he would definitely "beef" up our central area......just a thought ..........!

yes, lets play another player out of position.
 

Mark Phillips

At the end of the day it does not matter who Wilson comes back for or not as the case may be, or whether the person he replaces has played well or not, its about picking a team to get 3 points. If we win I don't care who plays. Each team selection to be judged on a game by game basis, no room for sentiment. I trust that Andy will do what's best for the team, if he does not then he is failing in his job methinks...
 

Mark Phillips

If Scott thinks Bennett and Wilson is his best partnership he should pick them. .

But he hasn't, he has played wilson at RB when all 3 are fit. If he through wilson and and bennett was the best pairing he would have dropped phillips and played foster at RB two weeks ago.

On the other hand if AS had a squad of players he thought was good enough he would play them as when available and fit and drop them if they lose form (unless its bennett of course) and mix it up as he felt necessary.

Maybe there is no conspiracy theory.
 

Mark Phillips

why dont we just solve the problem by playing 5 at the back and then dickson/foster can push down the wings?

just a thought....:fishing:

Possibly because we have brought 3 new players into our squad who are all wingers to join Wood and it would be a shame to drop all 4 to accomodate a CB who is on loan and is basically back up to the two CB's we own.

Why completely change a system to squash in a CB, we have 3 CB's fighting over two places which is the way it should always be. They will all get their chance, just do not play one of them at RB IMO.
 

Mark Phillips

Correction - BFC has four CB's and one loanee fighting over two places.

I think you understand the point I make whether it is 2,3 or 4 fighting or a place.

Maybe we should play 4 at the back with wingbacks and one holding midfielder and then three up front then they can all get a game (except the midfield of course)
 

Mark Phillips

Great news .
 

Mark Phillips

Mark Phillips

Good news that the squad has been further enhanced.

I hope that Pim's loan can be extended and Legge cannot be dropped at the moment so we are more than covered now for central defenders even if Wilson goes back in Jan.
 

Mark Phillips

Wilson, Pim, Legge, Osborne, Bennett, Phillips, too many centre halfs at the club at the moment
 

Mark Phillips

Agreed, too many CBs now.

Wilsons loan wont be renewed and I can see Osborne going out on loan in January - although I'd have him at right back ahead of Foster.
 

Mark Phillips

Who is MP trying to kid. Even if he has recovered his fitness he aint match fit, It would be stupid to drop Legge or Pim now to accomodate him.
 

Mark Phillips

I would send out Karleigh out on loan.
Keep Wilson for as long as we can and start him at CB.
 

Mark Phillips

And who would you drop to make way for Mr Wilson?

As he states he would play him at RB then it can only be one person. :confused: Foster is ok at best and has no real competition apart from Wilson or Osborne playing out of position.
I wonder if Scott might look for a RB on loan in January instead of keeping Wilson. Especially if we could get Pim for the season :idea:
 

Mark Phillips

Pim and Legge can't be touched at the moment. Phillips started well but he and whoever weren't capable of helping keep a clean sheet for a fair few weeks.
 

Mark Phillips

Pim and Legge can't be touched at the moment. Phillips started well but he and whoever weren't capable of helping keep a clean sheet for a fair few weeks.


Spot on NB :sorted:
 

Mark Phillips

Legge stepping up to the mark has been a huge surprise but a very pleasant one.

It may mean the end of Wilson's spell with us which would be a shame but Legge is ours and will undoubtably get even better.

Phillips can only be back up centre half at the moment at best.

To keep Wilson others would have to be moved on, can't see who and where but AS has a habit of coming up with surprises so you never know.
 

Mark Phillips

If we can't extend Balkestein's loan, then Phillips would be the player to come in for me. He was our best defender at the start of the season, and Exeter was his only bad game.

I think Osborne needs a month on loan at a League 2 side, leaving Bennett as our back-up option.
 

Mark Phillips

Legge stepping up to the mark has been a huge surprise but a very pleasant one.

It may mean the end of Wilson's spell with us which would be a shame but Legge is ours and will undoubtably get even better.

Phillips can only be back up centre half at the moment at best.

To keep Wilson others would have to be moved on, can't see who and where but AS has a habit of coming up with surprises so you never know.


Good post stanley. IMo Legge has been the surprise package this season. I dont think any forward in Division ! will enjoy being marked by him. Look at tye way he kept Beckwood or Beckford (Whatever his ****ing name is) quiet last Saturday.
 

Mark Phillips

Let's not forget that Pim had as much to do with Beckford having an average game. They worked well as a pair I thought so credit is definitely overdue to Holland's number 1.
 

Mark Phillips

Wilson can go back, plenty of cover their if Pim stays. Striker needed on loan please
 

Mark Phillips

Guessing it will be either be Pim or Wilson to stay for the season depending on what the parent clubs have to say
 

Mark Phillips

Pim has been superb. A very hard looking bastard who I'm sure panto dame Beckford didn't fancy upsetting.
 

Mark Phillips

Im sure Keane said Pims was in his plans so for the long term loan Wilson would seem more likely.
But i like Wilson and dont wanna see him go, he'll leave Bristol City and go off and be a hero somewhere else, on a free probs.
lets get him signed up.

It was not long ago everyone was bum licking Wilson and now....?
 

Mark Phillips

Pim has been superb. A very hard looking bastard who I'm sure panto dame Beckford didn't fancy upsetting.
****ing right son. Just imagine your a forward with those two to beat Legge & Pim) If it were me I'd be sh*tting a brick.
 

Mark Phillips

Im sure Keane said Pims was in his plans so for the long term loan Wilson would seem more likely.
But i like Wilson and dont wanna see him go, he'll leave Bristol City and go off and be a hero somewhere else, on a free probs.
lets get him signed up.

It was not long ago everyone was bum licking Wilson and now....?


I would like to see us sign James Wilson, Pim and Legge will keep their places for the time being but things change. If Keane calls Pim back and Wilson goes back to Briz we'll be left with 3 centre backs which IMO only one is good enough.....Captain Mark :sorted::sorted:
It's true people on here were singing his praises, I still am, but now it appears the fickle bunch aren't bothered if he stays or goes......:rolleyes:
 

Mark Phillips

Even though Wilson can't be accommodated at centre-back at the moment, I just fail to see how he isn't in the side at right-back ahead of Foster. Even allowing for the fact that he would be a 'centre-back-playing-out-of-position' Wilson has real quality, even playing at full-back.

He's got to be better than Foster who in my opinion is no more than League Two standard. He gives opposing players far too much room and he's a one-trick-pony when playing the ball forward.
 

Mark Phillips

Assuming they are fit, has to be Pim and Leon for MK. Phillips would be competing with Wilson to be third choice IMHO at the moment. What happens next may depend largely on how willing Ipswich are to extend Pim's loan, but of the 6 CBs we have at present, I would expect at least 1, possibly 2, to have gone by the end of Jan
 

Mark Phillips

Assuming they are fit, has to be Pim and Leon for MK. Phillips would be competing with Wilson to be third choice IMHO at the moment. What happens next may depend largely on how willing Ipswich are to extend Pim's loan, but of the 6 CBs we have at present, I would expect at least 1, possibly 2, to have gone by the end of Jan


Osborne and Bennett ?
 

Mark Phillips

wilson has been sent back to bristol surplus to requirments
 

Mark Phillips

anywhere he can to get a game as that's why players like him go on loan I know the two centre backs have done well but a can't see why james was moved to rb after the millwall game I would imagine when he came back from international duty he was dissapointed to see another cb in on loan in the space of two weeks he went from a decent young footballer to crap and send him back WOW
 

Mark Phillips

I guess the manager's there to make those kind of decisions. After all, players don't get sacked do they?
 
Back
Top Bottom