Isleworth_Bee
Well-known member
Enough is Enough
As somebody reported seeing Nico on the train at 6 PM, they obviously weren't locked in for long.
He is one of Smiths favourites
As somebody reported seeing Nico on the train at 6 PM, they obviously weren't locked in for long.
Yes. So what about when we ripped apart reading and brighton ? Who are both in the mix at the right end .
With 5 points from 9 games, at what point do you think we should panic?Anyhow, it's not yet time for this panic or hysteria.
I just want to read that :
We won't sell Hogan until summer
We are looking to beef up midfield in Jan
Swap places?
What does Smith do
A) get the players in for training today and no rest day on Wednesday?
B) tell the players to stay away till Wednesday?
". That was the most abject, dispiriting, awful apology for a Brentford team I have had the misfortune to watch in over 60 years. No creativity, no oomph, 7 fouls - what's going on, at least Beckford and Doyle showed some oomph.
You obviously only get to a couple of games a season.
What does Smith do
A) get the players in for training today and no rest day on Wednesday?
B) tell the players to stay away till Wednesday?
What does Smith do
A) get the players in for training today and no rest day on Wednesday?
B) tell the players to stay away till Wednesday?
Or C: Give the players today and Wednesday off in the belief that the 'chat' after yesterday's game has given them plenty to think about.
Yes but of all 4 suggestions, that is the one that won't happen, rightly or wrongly.Or D: next international break send them off on work placements into offices and warehouses so they can begin to appreciate their privileged status. Those that get sent to the farm can count chickens. Oh, and pay them the appropriate wages for the week.
As somebody reported seeing Nico on the train at 6 PM, they obviously weren't locked in for long.
When you look at Pritchard yesterday, it's clear that we have been badly let down in the loan market this year. We're now in December and Kaikai has had no impact and Elder has been unfortunate. Those two need to go back on Jan 1st and we have to get better. The new rules around emergency loans have hit us as well because any other season would have seen us get someone through the door in the last month.
When you look at Pritchard yesterday, it's clear that we have been badly let down in the loan market this year. We're now in December and Kaikai has had no impact and Elder has been unfortunate. Those two need to go back on Jan 1st and we have to get better. The new rules around emergency loans have hit us as well because any other season would have seen us get someone through the door in the last month.
They cheated the FFP system and went up.
Totally correct, but is it DS or DoF who are responsible. I find the lack of communication from the DoF very poor at present, and contributes to the fans feeling not so involved over the last 18 months. It not all down to DS, other need. To stand and be responsible.
I just want to read that :
We won't sell Hogan until summer
We are looking to beef up midfield in Jan
............Burger King employee of the Month..........What is Trotta up to these days?
Regarding the need for a defensive midfielder, we were linked with George Evans who was deemed to be exactly what we needed but unfortunately chose Reading over us.
What I find strange (unless someone corrects me) is that we haven't been linked with a defensive midfielder since then, yet it stands out like a sore thumb that this is prority
We have, John Lundstram at Oxford United.
We have, John Lundstram at Oxford United.
But it doesn't immediately appear to me that that position has been identified as a priority. It was IMO, one of the very first which needed filling in the close season. I just think recruitment in general over the past two seasons has been such a hotch potch. Grossly overloaded in some positions, lacking in pace generally and reliant on a single striker with a poor injury record.
This is spot on IMO. It's the equivalent of going into Primark needing a jumper not finding a suitable one so you buy a pair of trousers instead even though you have many already. The jumper is the defensive midfielder and the pair of trousers is Sawyers (although I don't think he is a bad player)
But it doesn't immediately appear to me that that position has been identified as a priority. It was IMO, one of the very first which needed filling in the close season. I just think recruitment in general over the past two seasons has been such a hotch potch. Grossly overloaded in some positions, lacking in pace generally and reliant on a single striker with a poor injury record.
Couldn't agree more. The last three transfer windows have seen us acquire a few gems (such as Bentley and Colin), a rather larger number of duds (such as Hofmann, Kerschbaumer and Gogia) and an even bigger number of maybes/hopefuls (such as Woods, Sawyers and Vibe). The overall quality is fairly poor. Where recruitment has been unsuccessful it has saddled us with expensive players on long contracts who will be hard to move on.
More worrying still is the lack of any coherent plan as to the shape and balance of the whole squad. Players seem to have been signed ad hoc on the basis of future resale value rather than their immediate value to the squad. I can see the point of that in some ways, naturally, but it has produced a very unbalanced squad (too many inexperienced players and too many players in the same positions).
I suspect that this all stems from our structure, namely the "transfer committee" led by the DoFs. I suggest that Smith be given overall responsibility for recruitment in January so that a single (footballing) brain guides our strategy. I'm not saying that we should give him the chequebook and stand back - his proposals would still be subject to approval by the DoFs and ultimately of course by the owner (who owns the chequebook!) - but I don't see a committee being capable of solving our problems.
I suspect that this all stems from our structure, namely the "transfer committee" led by the DoFs. I suggest that Smith be given overall responsibility for recruitment in January so that a single (footballing) brain guides our strategy. I'm not saying that we should give him the chequebook and stand back - his proposals would still be subject to approval by the DoFs and ultimately of course by the owner (who owns the chequebook!) - but I don't see a committee being capable of solving our problems.
............Burger King employee of the Month..........
Couldn't agree more. The last three transfer windows have seen us acquire a few gems (such as Bentley and Colin), a rather larger number of duds (such as Hofmann, Kerschbaumer and Gogia) and an even bigger number of maybes/hopefuls (such as Woods, Sawyers and Vibe). The overall quality is fairly poor. Where recruitment has been unsuccessful it has saddled us with expensive players on long contracts who will be hard to move on.
More worrying still is the lack of any coherent plan as to the shape and balance of the whole squad. Players seem to have been signed ad hoc on the basis of future resale value rather than their immediate value to the squad. I can see the point of that in some ways, naturally, but it has produced a very unbalanced squad (too many inexperienced players and too many players in the same positions).
I suspect that this all stems from our structure, namely the "transfer committee" led by the DoFs. I suggest that Smith be given overall responsibility for recruitment in January so that a single (footballing) brain guides our strategy. I'm not saying that we should give him the chequebook and stand back - his proposals would still be subject to approval by the DoFs and ultimately of course by the owner (who owns the chequebook!) - but I don't see a committee being capable of solving our problems.
I really, really don't want to see that happen.
No. No. No.
It is ludicrous to point at hof, KK (both barely played), gogia (doing well in German 2nd div), Vibe (14 goals last season) and ignore the loads of excellent players we've signed in recent years to conclude that Smith, whose only definite influence on signings is likely to have been on sawyers & Henry, should be given the power to drive recruitment. Most were supportive of the club not ceding to this demand from Warburton and unlike Smith he'd actually had a big say in putting together the team.
Giving Smith more powers now is barely a better option than installing Andy Scott as manager again.
Sorry, to be clear, I am not pointing any fingers and don't intend to. Kaikai was pretty unanimously welcomed and we would have had every confidence that Elder would be decent They have both disappointed.
Not entirely true to say that Elder has disappointed, at least yet IMO; been out whilst things have gone down hill and we wouldn't have had this thread at all in the aftermath of the QPR game; or for that matter after Birmingham a week ago.
Is that because of an aversion to Smith or to the idea of putting recruitment in the hands of a single footballing brain?
I could understand the former. But the so-called transfer committee" has hardly been a rip-roaring success has it?
From the manager right through the squad we're just not good enough, worrying amount of change needed IMO
But it doesn't immediately appear to me that that position has been identified as a priority. It was IMO, one of the very first which needed filling in the close season. I just think recruitment in general over the past two seasons has been such a hotch potch. Grossly overloaded in some positions, lacking in pace generally and reliant on a single striker with a poor injury record.
Couldn't agree more. The last three transfer windows have seen us acquire a few gems (such as Bentley and Colin), a rather larger number of duds (such as Hofmann, Kerschbaumer and Gogia) and an even bigger number of maybes/hopefuls (such as Woods, Sawyers and Vibe). The overall quality is fairly poor. Where recruitment has been unsuccessful it has saddled us with expensive players on long contracts who will be hard to move on.
More worrying still is the lack of any coherent plan as to the shape and balance of the whole squad. Players seem to have been signed ad hoc on the basis of future resale value rather than their immediate value to the squad. I can see the point of that in some ways, naturally, but it has produced a very unbalanced squad (too many inexperienced players and too many players in the same positions).
I suspect that this all stems from our structure, namely the "transfer committee" led by the DoFs. I suggest that Smith be given overall responsibility for recruitment in January so that a single (footballing) brain guides our strategy. I'm not saying that we should give him the chequebook and stand back - his proposals would still be subject to approval by the DoFs and ultimately of course by the owner (who owns the chequebook!) - but I don't see a committee being capable of solving our problems.
Is that because of an aversion to Smith or to the idea of putting recruitment in the hands of a single footballing brain?
I could understand the former. But the so-called transfer committee" has hardly been a rip-roaring success has it?
I think the point about defensive midfield is spot on and one that many of use have been making for a very long time. However, I think the more general criticism of recruitment is overstated. Are we really 'grossly overloaded in some positions'? Personally, I like the fact we have four good quality CBs and think we could make good use of these if we persisted with three at the back. We perhaps have one too many central midfelders, but that is bound to happen occasionally. As for the single striker and lack of pace, I very much doubt we find ourselves in this situation because of the deliberate intentions of the recruiters. They have tried to recruit strikers, but we all know how difficult it is to get good ones for a price we can afford, so we have ended up with Vibe and Hoff. Pace is an issue, but I imagine it was hoped that Kaikai could deliver that. So, sure, recruitment has not been ideal, but I think this is manly down to the constraint under which we operate. And, actually, I still think we are only a couple of (experienced) players away from being a good side.